Hi Jaana:
Thanks for taking the call today....
-----Original Message-----
From: Jaana Nyfjord [mailto:jaananyfjord@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 9:02 AM
To: steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Package owner's conference call
Steve,
I was on the package call today, and I was asked to forward a couple of
concerns to you:
1. Ricardo and Chris (?) wondered about the status of the submission of
some
XMI-stuff. They wanted to remind you about this.
>>>>If I have
done things correctly, plugin.xmi should be unlocked. I started work on it last
night had to go to class and then forgot about it. Should be ok now.
2. How about the M6 bugs that are resolved. Were you able to change the
status in Bugzilla, e.g. the renaming of architecture principle?
Haven’t changed it
yet, should be done tonight or tomorrow.
3. It seems that the term collaboration is not in the glossary, it is
fixed
in Bugzilla but not moved to CVS so this bug is moved to M7.
It is now….
Other than that, things seems to be in control.
Maybe we could have a quick chat when you are at ECE next time?
/Jaana
>From: "Steve Adolph" <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: "'Per Kroll'" <pkroll@xxxxxxxxxx>
>CC: <blyons@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Jaana Nyfjord'"
<jaananyfjord@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Package owner's conference call
>Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 14:09:50 -0700
>
>Hi Per:
>
>
>
>I won't be able to make tomorrow's conference call, but here are
few things
>to report:
>
>
>
>I have a couple of M6 issues that are still open specifically
>
>
>173683 <https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=173683>
>
>Mon 20:05
>
>nor
>
>P3
>
>PC
>
>ASSI
>
>EPF
>
>Content
>
>1.0
>
>1.0 M6
>
>General - Rename Core Principle "Focus on articulating th...
>
>
>164687 <https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=164687>
>
>2007-03-24
>
>nor
>
>P3
>
>PC
>
>RESO
>
>EPF
>
>Content
>
>0.9
>
>1.0 M6
>
>General - Add the term "Collaboration" to the glossary
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>176455 <https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=176455>
>
>2007-03-24
>
>nor
>
>P3
>
>PC
>
>RESO
>
>EPF
>
>Content
>
>0.9
>
>1.0 M6
>
>General - Create first draft of OpenUP Case Study
>
>
>176456 <https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=176456>
>
>2007-03-24
>
>nor
>
>P3
>
>PC
>
>RESO
>
>EPF
>
>Content
>
>0.9
>
>1.0 M6
>
>General - First draft of case study white paper.
>
>
>
>For 173683 and 164687 I am having some problems with updating CVS.
Ricardo
>is giving help on this so these should be closed soon.
>
>I can close 176455 and 176456 and re-open M7 bugs for them. For the
M7 work
>I am enlisting help. Nice thing about being overloaded is it
finally
>convinces you that you cannot do everything on your own and makes
you ask
>for help
>
>
>
>For M7 we really need to resolve the lifecycle diagram I would
suggest this
>is becoming critical.
>
>
>
>Best regards,
>
>Steve
>
>
>
>
>
> _____
>
>From: Per Kroll [mailto:pkroll@xxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 4:44 PM
>To: Steve Adolph
>Cc: blyons@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: General and Overarching issues committer...
>
>
>
>
>Steve,
>
>thanks for the heads up, and thanks for all your work so far!
>We discussed this in last weeks iteration assessment and I wanted
to give
>people some time to think about a replacement. Would Jaana be a
good
>candidate to step up?
>
>Cheers
>
>Per Kroll
>STSM, Manager Methods: RUP / RMC
>Project Lead: Eclipse Process Framework
>Rational Software, IBM Corp
>(M) 408-219-2963
>
>
>
>
>"Steve Adolph" <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>03/26/2007 06:18 PM
>
>
>To
>
>Per Kroll/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS, <blyons@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>cc
>
>
>
>
>Subject
>
>General and Overarching issues committer...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Hi Guys:
>
>I have to face the reality that I do not have enough time to
effectively
>manage general and overarching issues. This morning crystallized
that for
>me
>when I was unable to call in on the M6 assessment. I had hoped that
I would
>be able to devote more time to managing the general and overarching
issues
>during M6 and get things back on track. However, I should remember
the
>banner line on my home page "hope is not a course of
action" So simply I
>wish to resign as the package owner for general and overarching
issues. I
>am
>concern that progress on this package has come to standstill and
right now
>it needs someone who has the time to get on top of the stalled
issues and
>resolve them. I will continue contributing to OpenUP and
continue
>contributing as a committer.
>
>Best regards,
>Steve Adolph
>
_________________________________________________________________
Schlagersignaler till mobilen http://msn.cellus.se/