Re: [epf-dev] Challenge - Five words for why architecture in OpenUP

[Ana Valente Pereira <apereira@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I like this one ... and it goes with the graphics produced in irvine ... 
the one with the risks comming down while the solution (stability) goes up

Ana

Jim Ruehlin wrote:

> We don't mention any disciplines or practices in the other core
> principles. To be consistent, we could remove the reference to
> architecture and let the principle guide the reader to the discipline.
> Maybe something like:
>
>
>
> Focus on eliminating technical risk early to increase stability and
> predictability.
>
>
>
> - Jim
>
>
>
> ____________________
>
> Jim Ruehlin, IBM Rational
>
> RUP Content Developer
>
> Eclipse Process Framework (EPF) Committer www.eclipse.org/epf
>
> email:   jruehlin@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> phone:  760.505.3232
>
> fax:      949.369.0720
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of "Jaana Nyfjord" <jaana@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 9:53 AM
> To: epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [epf-dev] Challenge - Five words for why architecture in OpenUP
>
>
>
> Hi everyone! 
>
> I need to collect some proposals and then get a vote on the best
> proposal 
> to be able to close the bug concerning the formulation of the
> architecture 
> principle in OpenUp. 
>
> A summary of the discussion so far, shows that 
>
> - this principle needs be formulated in the same way as the other three 
> principles, i.e. "focus on . to ." ? 
>
> But, we have NOT agreed on: 
> - what the fundamental purpose and meaning of architecture and 
> architecture-centric is and why this must be focused on in OpenUp 
>
> There are currently four different suggestions of how to present this 
> principle: 
>
> 1. "Focus on articulating the architecture" 
> 2. "Focus on the architecture to promote a shared view of the solution" 
> 3. "Focus on articulating the architecture to retire risks early in the 
> project lifecycle." 
> 4. "Focus on the architecture to retire risks early." 
>
> To resolve this bug, please consider the existing suggestions and let us
> know with which proposal you agree, or propose a new core principle. 
>
> I expect to have your proposals by Tuesday next week (March 20) to set
> up 
> a vote and then resolve this bug before the end of M6. 
>
> Looking forward to some challenging creativity, 
> Jaana Nyfjord 
>
>
> _______________________________________________ 
> epf-dev mailing list 
> epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev 
>
>  
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> epf-dev mailing list
> epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
>