Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
[epf-dev] Monday RM + PM Conf Call - Priorities?

Hi,

from the below meeting minutes it is clear that we will focus the RM review Monday 8 AM Pacific time on
----------------------------------
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=162628 (Role Analyst)
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=162639 (RM Artifacts)
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=162634 (RM Tasks)

A conference call is scheduled for 8am pacific time on Monday, November 20 (see here http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/epf-dev/msg01307.html).

Those 3 bugs contain tons of smaller issues, so that will keep us busy (note that you should if at all possible review the attachments in those bugs so we can have a focused meeting.)
---------------------------------

There is tons of stuff to cover on the PM call at 9 AM Pacific, and we will only be able to cover a fraction in an hour. Do we have a similar prioritization for that call so we know what people should focus their review on?
Shall we use the same order as we use for RM? This would give:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=163863 (PM Role)
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=163864 (PM Tasks)
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=163868 (PM Artifacts)

A conference call is scheduled for 9am pacific time on Monday, November 27 (see here http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/epf-dev/msg01319.html).

I think this will give us plenty to focus on. Sorry if this was already covered in some e-mail....

Thanks

Per Kroll
STSM, Manager Methods: RUP / RMC
Project Lead: Eclipse Process Framework
Rational Software, IBM Corp
(M) 408-219-2963


"Brian Lyons" <blyons@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

11/16/2006 03:53 PM

Please respond to
Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List        <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To
"Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List" <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
[epf-dev] Minutes from yesterday's content concall





hiho,
 
We had a conference call yesterday at 8am pacific time.  The minutes are attached.
 
It is pretty lengthy.  One time-sensitive issue is that we have three coarse-grained bugs based on Jim Ruehlin’s review of the Requirements content.  Chris Sibbald, Requirements package owner, has attached a spreadsheet to each of the bugs asking that additional reviewers at their comments to Jim’s issues in that form by COB on Friday, November 17.  Here are the relevant bugs:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=162628 (Role Analyst)
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=162639 (RM Artifacts)
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=162634 (RM Tasks)
 
                                              ------------------- b_______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev

Attachment: Meeting Minutes - 061115.doc
Description: Binary data

Back to the top