[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [epf-dev] Refactoring of Visual Modeling packages
|
|
Sub packages for modeling sounds a sensible idea.
Cheers
Mark
Mark Dickson
SE&E Practice
Xansa
0780 1917480
*** sent from my blackberry ***
----- Original Message -----
From: epf-dev-bounces
Sent: 06/20/2006 01:08 PM
To: Ricardo Balduino <balduino@xxxxxxxxxx>; epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [epf-dev] Refactoring of Visual Modeling packages
Hi Ricardo,
Would we need sub-packages for each
discipline or modeling view? For instance, would someone want UC modeling but
not other UML modeling information?
- Jim
____________________
Jim Ruehlin, IBM
Rational
RUP Content
Developer
Eclipse Process
Framework (EPF) Committer
email:
jruehlin@xxxxxxxxxx
phone:
760.505.3232
fax:
949.369.0720
From:
epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ricardo Balduino/Cupertino/IBM
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 10:51
AM
To: epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [epf-dev] Refactoring of
Visual Modeling packages
Hi all,
As
part of implementing bug "Refactor Use-Case Model into separate package
(https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=147349), I though of creating a
package called visual_modeling (under Requirements package), following the same
convention used in Architecture and Development packages.
Another
level of refactoring I though could be useful - that I would like to ask your
opinion about - is: should we put all these vm packages together in only one
package called visual_modeling? This package would be outside of Architecture,
Development and RM, but would contribute stuff to each of them. This would
offer an all-or-nothing approach, where visual modeling is fully included in a
given configuration or not.
Please,
let me know what you think. If there aren't strong contrary opinions, I'll
proceed with the refactoring.
Thanks,
Ricardo Balduino
Senior Software Engineer
IBM | RUP Team | EPF Committer
Phone: 1 (408) 863-5019 (TL: 560-5019)
www.ibm.com
www.eclipse.org/epf
_______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
Whilst this email has been checked for all known viruses, recipients should undertake their own virus checking as Xansa will not accept any liability whatsoever.
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and protected by client privilege. It is solely for the use of the intended recipient.
Please delete it and notify the sender if you have received it in
error. Unauthorised use is prohibited.
Any opinions expressed in this email are those of the individual and not
necessarily the organisation.
Xansa, Registered Office: 420 Thames Valley Park Drive,
Thames Valley Park, Reading, RG6 1PU, UK.
Registered in England No.1000954.
t +44 (0)8702 416181
w www.xansa.com
|
_______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
