I prefer OpenUP.
 
By the way doesn’t anyone take a
statutory holiday off anymore?
Steve
 
From:
epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Charles Yan
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 3:40
PM
To: Eclipse
 Process Framework Project Developers List
Subject: RE: [epf-dev] VOTE:
OpenUp => New name for BUP++
 
 
I also vote for OpenUP. 
Charlie Yan
IBM Method Engineering Manager
EPF Tooling Dev Lead
Phone: 408-342-4681
 
  | 
   Ricardo
  Balduino/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS  
  Sent
  by: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx  
  04/14/2006 03:37 PM  
  
   
    | 
     Please
    respond to 
Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List
    <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> 
     | 
    
   
   
   | 
  
  
   
    | 
     To 
     | 
    
     Eclipse Process Framework
     Project Developers List
    <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>  
     | 
    
   
    | 
     cc 
     | 
    
       
     | 
    
   
    | 
     Subject 
     | 
    
     RE: [epf-dev] VOTE: OpenUp => New name for
    BUP++ 
     | 
    
   
    
  
   
   | 
 
OpenUP looks better and keeps a connection to Unified Process. I vote for that.
Ricardo Balduino
Senior Software Engineer
IBM | RUP Team | EPF Committer
Phone: 1 (408) 863-5019 (TL: 560-5019)
www.ibm.com
www.eclipse.org/epf
 
  | 
   Per Kroll/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS  
  Sent by: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx  
  04/14/2006 11:11 AM  
  
   
    | 
     Please
    respond to 
Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List
    <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> 
     | 
    
   
   
   | 
  
  
   
    | 
     To 
     | 
    
     Eclipse Process Framework
     Project Developers List <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
     
     | 
    
   
    | 
     cc 
     | 
    
     "'Eclipse
     Process Framework Project Developers List'"
    <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx  
     | 
    
   
    | 
     Subject 
     | 
    
     RE: [epf-dev] VOTE: OpenUp => New name for
    BUP++ 
     | 
    
   
    
  
   
   | 
 
Hi, 
several people have approched me about whether to use OpenUP or OpenUp, and I
realize that all the discussions on this issue before and after me sending the
voting e-mail was done outside this public forum. So, I wanted to give people a
chance to chip in. 
The reason for lowercase is to denote that we talk about a "small
process". 
The reason for uppercase is to keep the connection to Unified Process, which
still carries a lot of weight. Some people also think OpenUP looks better.
Opinions? 
<There are no legal ramifications, they do not care about
lower/uppercase.> 
Cheers 
Per Kroll
STSM, Manager Methods: RUP / RMC
Project Lead: Eclipse Process Framework
Rational Software, IBM Corp
408-342-3815 
 
  | 
   "steve" <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  
  Sent by: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx  
  04/12/2006 02:03 PM  
  
   
    | 
     Please
    respond to 
Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List
    <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> 
     | 
    
   
   
   | 
  
     
  
   
    | 
     To 
     | 
    
     "'Eclipse
     Process Framework Project Developers List'"
    <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>  
     | 
    
   
    | 
     cc 
     | 
    
       
     | 
    
   
    | 
     Subject 
     | 
    
     RE: [epf-dev] VOTE: OpenUp => New name for
    BUP++ 
     | 
    
   
   
   
   
  
   
   | 
 
Hmmm, wouldn't that be "OpenUp or I'll UP
your house down" :-) 
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Scott W. Ambler
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 1:51 PM
To: Eclipse Process
 Framework Project Developers List
Subject: RE: [epf-dev] VOTE: OpenUp => New name
for BUP++
One observation.  A name like OpenUp leaves
you vulnerable to big bad 
wolf jokes.  e.g. "OpenUp or I'll
develop your house down."
On a side note about the dangers of not thinking
through the joke 
potential of a name, a Canadian friend of mine
just named his newborn 
son "Robert Mackenzie".  Bob
Mackenzie is a famous Canadian TV character.
- Scott
At 04:35 PM 4/12/2006, you wrote:
>I cast a Yes vote.
>
>Charlie Yan
>EPF Tooling Dev Lead
>Phone: 408-342-4681
====================================================
Scott W. Ambler  :-)
Senior Consultant, Ambysoft Inc.
www.ambysoft.com/scottAmbler.html
Refactoring Databases: Evolutionary Database
Design 
(www.ambysoft.com/books/refactoringDatabases.html)
is now available! 
_______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
_______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
_______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
_______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev