[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
| 
Re: [epf-dev] Status from 3/30 BUP call with authors
 | 
Sorry for missing the call.  Darn client stuff keeps getting in the way.  ;-)
Anyway, I'm in the process of filling out the 
comitter paperwork, so I'll hopefully be up and running early next week.
- Scott
At 08:51 AM 4/1/2006, you wrote:
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
        boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C65593.6B8736F3"
hiho,
On Thursday, 3/30 at 8am PST, there was a 
conference call on assigning ownership to BUP 
content as we modify and complete the IBM 
donation for the 1.0 launch scheduled for 9/1/2006.
On the call were:
·         Steve Adolph, UBC
·         Ricardo Balduino, IBM
·         Mark Dickson, Xansas/DSDM Consortium
·         Chris Doyle, Synergy Plus
·         Brian Lyons, Number Six Software, Inc.
·         Bruce MacIsaac, IBM
·         Jim Ruehl, IBM
·         Chris Sibbald, Telelogic
We decided to have each content package in BUP 
assigned to a committer (or  based on duration 
it is taking  someone on track to be a 
committer).  We discussed that the templates 
package is not really a logical separate area, 
but only broken out for convenience of process 
engineers; each template would be the 
responsibility of the owner of the relevant 
discipline.  In this pass the Process is not the focus.
The assignment of a package does not imply that 
the individual is solely responsible for 
authoring all the content.  The assignment of 
the package is responsibility that the content gets authored.
Based on the participants on the call, the 
responsible parties are shown below.  One 
addition is that we have a pending decision on 
project management because Kirti Vaidya had 
proclaimed an interest in that, but was not on the call.
Package
Owner
architecture
Chris Dickson, Xansas
change_management
<vacant>
development
<vacant>
general
Steve Adolph, UBC
project_management
Kirti Vaidya, Covansys (pending)
requirements
Chris Sibbald, Telelogic
test
Brian Lyons, Number Six Software
Ricardo Balduino of IBM will manage the overall 
architecture of the process.  Based on the way 
EPF Composer works, Ricardo will be responsible 
for managing all relationships between 
elements.  And he is responsible for creating 
any additional elements that will subsequently 
be assigned to reside in a package.
If you are a committer or on your way to 
becoming one and you have an interest in being 
responsible for cm or development, please reply.
Everyone interested in contributing content 
should be getting Eclipse setup for CVS to 
access BUP.  That is the best way to get the 
most up-to-date content.  This is the real-time 
development repository that committers check 
their work into.  Official committers have 
read-write access, but anyone can use it to 
regularly pull the very latest content.
There will be a conference call on Thursday, 4/6 
at 8am PST to discuss updates and status of this 
work.  We have a milestone on 4/15 to be 
underway with authoring content and have all 
elements defined (albeit possibly 
incomplete).  As the various guidelines are 
often driven by the detail in the other process 
elements, we are giving ourselves some leeway in 
not strictly baselining those by that date.
                                               ------------ b
_______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
====================================================
Scott W. Ambler
Senior Consultant, Ambysoft Inc.
www.ambysoft.com/scottAmbler.html
Refactoring Databases: Evolutionary Database 
Design (www.ambysoft.com/books/refactoringDatabases.html) is now available!