[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
[emf-dev] Re: [modeling-pmc] PMC approval needed for committer vote for Lucas Bigeardel
|
Anne,
Thanks for the update. I'll wait patiently. The port is really helping
to stream line the processes so it's worth it to iron out the wrinkles...
Ed Merks/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
mailto: merks@xxxxxxxxxx
905-413-3265 (t/l 313)
Anne Jacko
<emo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To
11/30/2007 02:54 Ed Merks/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
PM cc
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx, emf-dev
<emf-dev%.eclipse.org@xxxxxxxxxx>,
emft-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx,
bjorn.freeman-benson@xxxxxxxxxxx,
"Sharon Corbett"
<sharon.corbett@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject
Re: [modeling-pmc] PMC approval
needed for committer vote for Lucas
Bigeardel
Hi Ed et al,
Karl was working on this, and he's not back in the office until
Monday. I know that he was looking at EMFT records in the Portal and
database to try and get everything in order, but I'm not sure of the
current status of what he was doing. If we can wait until Monday when
Karl can take a look at this, that would be best. He has the best
visibility to what happens in the Portal.
Thanks for following the processes and being patient... the component
process is new and we found ourselves needing to change the system to
accommodate components earlier than we had planned for, which is why
it's been a bit rocky.
Anne Jacko
Development Process Operations
Eclipse Foundation, Inc.
anne.jacko@xxxxxxxxxxx
503-784-3788
On Nov 30, 2007, at 4:00 AM, Ed Merks wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I hate to be a stickler for processes but if we don't follow them
> properly
> it will just likely bite us latter. I believe we have been
> following the
> processes carefully, including the excellent new improved process for
> provisioning a new components, but despite that, the portal records
> are a
> little out of whack. I opened this bugzilla a few days ago:
>
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=211046
>
> Unfortunately the only activity so far has been Sharon asking
>
> Hi Ed: Regarding this bug?.I?m a bit confused about it. Would
> this be
> Modelling?s effort on the refactoring front or?
>
> To which I replied:
>
> This is all simply trying to get the records to match all the
> paper work
> we've filed for the last few months. If you check your records
> for each
> of these committers it will confirm that they were elected to
> exactly
> these components. You can also confirm that we sent
> announcements for
> the creation the components themselves and you can confirm that
> they
> exist is CVS by virtue of having followed the processes to
> create them
> Somehow the records in the portal have failed to keep pace...
>
> I'm trying the best I can to follow the processes and to keep the EMO
> informed about discrepancies in the records the come from those
> processes.
> At this point, with the "invalid" vote just completed, I need some
> guidance
> as to how to proceed. I.e., before I approve this vote, I want to be
> absolutely clear that only the three ecoretools committers were
> eligible to
> vote and that the results of the election gives Lucas access to
> only the
> ecoretools component. If necessary I can veto this result and we
> can call
> a new election but given that I'm not sure the portal records are
> in place
> so that David can nominate Lucas for the ecoretools component I'm
> reluctant
> to do that; in fact, I'm pretty sure the records aren't fixed
> because this
> link still yields incomplete/incorrect results:
>
> http://www.eclipse.org/projects/lists.php?
> list=byproject¶m=modeling.emft
>
> If I do veto the vote, I want to be sure the EMF/EMFT developers
> understand
> the reason. I'd certainly like this to proceed quickly.
>
>
> Ed Merks/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
> mailto: merks@xxxxxxxxxx
> 905-413-3265 (t/l 313)
>
>
> ----- Forwarded by Ed Merks/Toronto/IBM on 11/30/2007 06:42 AM -----
>
> emo@xxxxxxxxxxx
> (portal on behalf
> of
> emo) To
> Sent by: modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> modeling-pmc-
> boun cc
> ces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Subject
> [modeling-pmc] PMC approval
> needed
> 11/30/2007 12:00 for committer vote for Lucas
> AM Bigeardel
>
>
> Please respond to
> PMC members
> mailing list
> <modeling-pmc@ecl
> ipse.org>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> modeling PMC Members,
> This automatically generated message marks the completion of voting
> for
> Lucas Bigeardel's Committer status on the modeling.emft project. As
> a PMC
> member, you can approve or disapprove this vote through your My
> Foundation
> portal page:
>
> http://portal.eclipse.org/
>
> Lucas Bigeardel was nominated by David Sciamma as follows:
> According to the last Modeling PMC meeting, I would like to
> nominate Lucas
> as a new Ecore Tools Committer (see
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=209718).
> Lucas is the leader of EMF Search component and is offering to
> contribute
> an Ecore Search implementation to Ecore Tools component. To
> maintain and
> develop this contribution, Lucas need to be an Ecore Tools committer.
> Please vote for this nomination.
>
>
> Vote summary: 14/0/0 with 19 pending
> +1 Freddy Allilaire
> ? Chris Aniszczyk
> ? Lucas Bigeardel
> ? Nick Boldt
> ? Cédric Brun
> +1 Sandro Böhme
> +1 Joel Cheuoua
> +1 Christopher Daly
> ? Stephan Eberle
> +1 Sven Efftinge
> ? Paul Elder
> +1 Peter Friese
> ? Miguel Garcia
> ? Laurent Goubet
> ? Arno Haase
> +1 Bernd Kolb
> +1 Jacques Lescot
> ? Ma Li
> +1 Ed Merks
> +1 Jonathan Musset
> +1 Peter Nehrer
> ? Marcelo Paternostro
> +1 David Sciamma
> ? Shaun Smith
> ? Eike Stepper
> ? Martin Taal
> ? Thiago Tonelli Bartolomei
> ? Antoine Toulme
> +1 Markus Voelter
> ? Guo Tong Xie
> ? Yang Yang
> ? Pan Yue
> +1 gilles cannenterre
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> modeling-pmc mailing list
> modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
>
