[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
| Re: [ee4j-pmc] Managed Beans 1.0 ? | 
I would agree. This is not substantive enough to split out yet.
Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S7, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
-------- Original message --------
From: David Blevins <dblevins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
Date: 4/29/19  3:36 PM  (GMT-05:00) 
To: EE4J PMC Discussions <ee4j-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx> 
Subject: Re: [ee4j-pmc] Managed Beans 1.0 ? 
Keeping this in the platform spec project would be my preference.
-- 
David Blevins
310-633-3852
 
  
    
  
  
    I expected we would contribute the spec document to the platform
    project, just like it was done for Java EE.  If the PMC wants to
    create a new project just for this, we can contribute the spec
    document there instead, but we need to decide soon.
    
    I don't believe there is a standalone TCK, and the API is part of
    Common Annotations, so there wouldn't be much in the spec project
    other than the spec document itself.  And the requirements defined
    by the spec really have platform-wide impact, which is why it was
    done in the platform project.
    
    
arjan tijms wrote on 4/29/19 11:31 AM:
    
    
      
      
        
          Hi Kevin,
            
            
            Managed Beans 1.0 is defined in the Java EE 6 spec. 
            
            
            
            
            
            (It's a short document, but quite an interesting read,
              as it sets the stage for things we still haven't done yet,
              but IMHO should)
            
            
            Kind regards,
            Arjan
            
            
            
            
           
       
      
      
        
        
          
            Hi,
            
            But, what about the Spec itself?  If I look
              at the Common Annotations specification, the very first
              sentence in section 2.16 indicates...
             
            "The ManagedBean
              annotation
                is used to declare a Managed Bean as specified in the Managed
                Beans specification."
            
              
                
                   
                  Did we miss this Spec Project when we first
                    defined them?  Or, was it expected to be part of
                    Common Annotations?  There are some rules and
                    requirements defined the Managed Beans 1.0 spec that
                    are not part of the Common Annotations 2.16
                    section...
                  
                 
               
             
           
          
          _______________________________________________
          ee4j-pmc mailing list
          ee4j-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
          To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
          unsubscribe from this list, visit
          https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-pmc
        
       
      
      
      _______________________________________________
ee4j-pmc mailing list
ee4j-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-pmc
    
    
  
_______________________________________________
ee4j-pmc mailing list
ee4j-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxxTo change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-pmc