Re: [ee4j-pmc] Short names and URLs

["Ian Robinson" <ian_robinson@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Wayne, a hierarchical structure might be more work for Eclipse but every time we discuss this we seem to end up trying to work around the flat structure. I don't want to slow us down by reopening this but I would not be surprised if a year along we found ourselves needing to do that. There's a level of collective scale here that a project hierarchy may have a benefit that eclipse has not observed before 

Regards,
Ian
Sent from IBM Verse

Bill Shannon --- Re: [ee4j-pmc] Short names and URLs ---

From:	"Bill Shannon" <bill.shannon@xxxxxxxxxx>
To:	"Wayne Beaton" <wayne.beaton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc:	"EE4J PMC Discussions" <ee4j-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 13 Dec 2017 22:53
Subject:	Re: [ee4j-pmc] Short names and URLs

---

If the web sites for all the EE4J projects were under http://www.eclipse.org/ee4j/, that would at least make the naming consistent.  Ditto https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/ee4j/.  Is there some reason not to do that?

Wayne Beaton wrote on 12/13/17 02:33 PM:

The project space is absolutely a hierarchy. e.g. look at the "Related Links" on the right of https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/ecd

I tend to argue against making a hierarchy any deeper than <root>/<tlp>/<project> because making it deeper adds work that doesn't add value.

We can make the w-Your data has been truncated. Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU