| Re: [ee4j-community] Committers don't have to contribute code |
Send ee4j-community mailing list submissions to
ee4j-community@xxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j- community
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ee4j-community-request@eclipse.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
ee4j-community-owner@eclipse.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of ee4j-community digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Committers don't have to contribute code (Martijn Verburg)
2. Re: Committers don't have to contribute code (Martijn Verburg)
3. Fwd: Jakarta EE logo selection process - next steps (Paul White)
------------------------------------------------------------ ----------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 20:37:28 +0200
From: Martijn Verburg <martijnverburg@xxxxxxxxx>
To: EE4J community discussions <ee4j-community@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [ee4j-community] Committers don't have to contribute code
Message-ID:
<CAP7YuASGS_DJ6aYuRtLsg9fG83X3A7iwQDyCOPxo >CHkce7fg1w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
We are a legal entity
Cheers,
Martijn
On 28 March 2018 at 18:11, Werner Keil <werner.keil@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> So short answer, a JUG like LJC is not a legal entity, therefore cannot
> have committers or show up in the mentioned stats?
>
> Werner
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 6:00 PM, <ee4j-community-request@eclipse.org >
> wrote:
>
>> Send ee4j-community mailing list submissions to
>> ee4j-community@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j- community
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> ee4j-community-request@eclipse.org
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> ee4j-community-owner@eclipse.org
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of ee4j-community digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>> 1. Re: Committers don't have to contribute code (Wayne Beaton)
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------ ----------
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 11:20:46 -0400
>> From: Wayne Beaton <wayne.beaton@eclipse-foundation.org >
>> To: EE4J community discussions <ee4j-community@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: Re: [ee4j-community] Committers don't have to contribute code
>> Message-ID:
>> <CALXWXwespttQMqpMtpxYUq7ETjUSY g99iMiyR=DaEKRujLTQog@xxxxxxx
>> ail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>
>>
>> You need to be a legal entity to be a member of the Eclipse Foundation.
>>
>> A company is a legal entity. There are several membership levels for
>> companies, I recommend that you use the contact information on the page
>> that you referenced if you have further questions.
>>
>> A committer, being a person, is also a legal entity and can join as a
>> committer member.
>>
>> Wayne
>>
>> P.S. I believe the accepted protocol when responding to a list digest is
>> to
>> trim away the content that is not relevant to the thread you're responding
>> to.
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 2:44 PM, Werner Keil <werner.keil@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Wayne,
>> >
>> > The most important question is, whether "company" can only be corporate
>> > entities like Ltd., PLC, etc. or the non-for-profit organizations,
>> > standards bodies, universities, research institutes, media and
>> publishing,
>> > government and other organization types as defined by the Eclipse
>> > Foundation board of directors (https://www.eclipse.org/
>> > membership/become_a_member/membershipTypes.php) also qualify if they
>> join
>> > as Solutions Members for 5000$ per year?
>> >
>> > I understand, a JUG that has no formal incorporation and membership
>> > registry could have a hard time regarding IP, but those that are
>> registered
>> > non-for-profit organizations, could they show up there, too if their
>> > members commit code?
>> >
>> > Werner
>> >
>> >
>> --
>> Wayne Beaton
>> Director of Open Source Projects
>> The Eclipse Foundation
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/ee4j- community/
>> attachments/20180328/c59b99b0/attachment.html>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ee4j-community mailing list
>> ee4j-community@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
>> from this list, visit
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j- community
>>
>>
>> End of ee4j-community Digest, Vol 7, Issue 134
>> **********************************************
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ee4j-community mailing list
> ee4j-community@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
> from this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j- community
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/ee4j- >community/attachments/ 20180328/dec2533f/attachment. html
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 20:38:14 +0200
From: Martijn Verburg <martijnverburg@xxxxxxxxx>
To: EE4J community discussions <ee4j-community@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [ee4j-community] Committers don't have to contribute code
Message-ID:
<CAP7YuAQje+xDcHiFpP9tx41YF6ZYVJ3d+ >2CWzBPtwzCDrL4bbg@mail.gmail. com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Heh, I missed the rest of the thread, apologies for the noise.
Cheers,
Martijn
On 28 March 2018 at 20:37, Martijn Verburg <martijnverburg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> We are a legal entity
>
> Cheers,
> Martijn
>
> On 28 March 2018 at 18:11, Werner Keil <werner.keil@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> So short answer, a JUG like LJC is not a legal entity, therefore cannot
>> have committers or show up in the mentioned stats?
>>
>> Werner
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 6:00 PM, <ee4j-community-request@eclipse.org >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Send ee4j-community mailing list submissions to
>>> ee4j-community@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j- community
>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>> ee4j-community-request@eclipse.org
>>>
>>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>> ee4j-community-owner@eclipse.org
>>>
>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>> than "Re: Contents of ee4j-community digest..."
>>>
>>>
>>> Today's Topics:
>>>
>>> 1. Re: Committers don't have to contribute code (Wayne Beaton)
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------ ----------
>>>
>>> Message: 1
>>> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 11:20:46 -0400
>>> From: Wayne Beaton <wayne.beaton@eclipse-foundation.org >
>>> To: EE4J community discussions <ee4j-community@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Subject: Re: [ee4j-community] Committers don't have to contribute code
>>> Message-ID:
>>> <CALXWXwespttQMqpMtpxYUq7ETjUSY g99iMiyR=DaEKRujLTQog@xxxxxxx
>>> ail.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>>
>>>
>>> You need to be a legal entity to be a member of the Eclipse Foundation.
>>>
>>> A company is a legal entity. There are several membership levels for
>>> companies, I recommend that you use the contact information on the page
>>> that you referenced if you have further questions.
>>>
>>> A committer, being a person, is also a legal entity and can join as a
>>> committer member.
>>>
>>> Wayne
>>>
>>> P.S. I believe the accepted protocol when responding to a list digest is
>>> to
>>> trim away the content that is not relevant to the thread you're
>>> responding
>>> to.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 2:44 PM, Werner Keil <werner.keil@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Wayne,
>>> >
>>> > The most important question is, whether "company" can only be corporate
>>> > entities like Ltd., PLC, etc. or the non-for-profit organizations,
>>> > standards bodies, universities, research institutes, media and
>>> publishing,
>>> > government and other organization types as defined by the Eclipse
>>> > Foundation board of directors (https://www.eclipse.org/
>>> > membership/become_a_member/membershipTypes.php) also qualify if they
>>> join
>>> > as Solutions Members for 5000$ per year?
>>> >
>>> > I understand, a JUG that has no formal incorporation and membership
>>> > registry could have a hard time regarding IP, but those that are
>>> registered
>>> > non-for-profit organizations, could they show up there, too if their
>>> > members commit code?
>>> >
>>> > Werner
>>> >
>>> >
>>> --
>>> Wayne Beaton
>>> Director of Open Source Projects
>>> The Eclipse Foundation
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>> URL: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/ee4j- community/atta
>>> chments/20180328/c59b99b0/attachment.html>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ee4j-community mailing list
>>> ee4j-community@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
>>> from this list, visit
>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j- community
>>>
>>>
>>> End of ee4j-community Digest, Vol 7, Issue 134
>>> **********************************************
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ee4j-community mailing list
>> ee4j-community@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
>> from this list, visit
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j- community
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/ee4j- >community/attachments/ 20180328/e7d8fccf/attachment. html
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 16:37:25 -0400
From: Paul White <paul.white@eclipse-foundation.org >
To: EE4J community discussions <ee4j-community@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [ee4j-community] Fwd: Jakarta EE logo selection process -
next steps
Message-ID:
<8D5540DB-D4F7-4755-AC9B-33160E37AB16@eclipse- >foundation.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
All,
As an update, we have done further analysis on the nine potential logos we had shortlisted.
Based on this analysis, we would like to suggest that we drop # 6 and # 9 as potential logos from the attached list of nine we had shared late last week (and is attached for convenience). As people pointed out on the GitHub Issue [link] those logos are too similar to other logos in our industry, and thus run the risk of not being able to get them trademarked.
So that would leave seven logos that we intend to carry forward to a community vote. We are confident any of the remaining six are good potential candidates to become the selected logo.
We will continue to do due diligence with respect to trademarking the seven candidate logos, but we are hopeful they all will remain as viable candidate logos going forward.
A separate note will be sent in the next few days with details on how to vote on these remaining seven logos.
Regards,
Paul
Paul White
paul.white@eclipse-foundation.org <mailto:paul.white@eclipse-foundation.org >
+1.613.852.4303 (mobile)
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: Paul White <paul.white@eclipse-foundation.org >
> Subject: Jakarta EE logo selection process - next steps
> Date: March 23, 2018 at 11:56:13 AM GMT-4
> To: EE4J community discussions <ee4j-community@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> All,
>
> We have now closed the submission process.
>
> Thank you for the many proposed logos, and associated comments. The contributions have been very useful.
>
> As described earlier in the process, the next steps are the following:
>
> The Eclipse Foundation has narrowed the list of submitted logos to a much shorter list of candidate logos, based on the criteria laid out in the design brief. In the interest of disclosure, this list of candidate logos is attached.
>
> We are not soliciting input on this shorter list. Rather, the next step is for the Eclipse Foundation to trim this list to a much shorter list of final candidate logos. This process will be driven by the Foundation?s marketing team, based on their experience and the intended objectives of the logo, as well as a much deeper dive into legal and other related issues. We thank you for your trust in us doing this in the best interest of the Jakarta EE community.
>
> From this process, the list of candidate logos will be trimmed to 2-4 final candidate logos. We are targeting completing this process by mid-next week.
>
> We will hold a community vote to determine which of these final candidate logos should be the chosen logo.
>
> Once the community vote is completed, the Foundation will take final steps to adopt the logo, and make an announcement to the community.
>
> Again, thank you to all for the input thus far, and we look forward to your input during the community vote.
>
> Regards,
> Paul
>
> Paul White
> paul.white@eclipse-foundation.org <mailto:paul.white@eclipse-foundation.org >
> +1.613.852.4303 (mobile)
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/ee4j- >community/attachments/ 20180328/d1274129/attachment. html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Logo_Finalists_JakartaEE.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 1389776 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/ee4j- >community/attachments/ 20180328/d1274129/attachment.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/ee4j- >community/attachments/ 20180328/d1274129/attachment- 0001.html
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
ee4j-community mailing list
ee4j-community@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j- community
End of ee4j-community Digest, Vol 7, Issue 141
**********************************************