On 23 Mar 2018, at 18:35, Markus KARG wrote:
> I second that. The EF should simply remove those logos which are
> legally problematic, and then let the community vote for their
> favorite. This is a community project, and
Isn't that what
| > * We will hold a community vote to determine which of these
| > final candidate logos should be the chosen logo.
says?
I understand Paul that the EF needs to (to quote you) "remove those logos
which are legally problematic", which is done by the marketing team, as they
know this process of removal best.
But then I may be wrong.
Heiko
_______________________________________________
ee4j-community mailing list
ee4j-community@xxxxxxxxxxxTo change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-community_______________________________________________
ee4j-community mailing list
ee4j-community@xxxxxxxxxxxTo change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-community