Re: [ee4j-community] EE4J Project Proposals

[Mike Milinkovich <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Otavio should approach emo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for assistance in this matter. Any such transfer would also have to be agreed to by the EE4J PMC (cc'd).

On 2017-11-22 12:12 PM, Werner Keil wrote:

Mike,

Thank you for confirming. Otavio asked me to assist moving all or relevant parts of JNoSQL under EE4J. The idea was also supported by at least one EE4J PMC member I spoke to.

If only the project lead (Otavio) can do this, please help him/us with the necessary process. If other committers can help, I am happy to do so.

Werner

On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 6:00 PM, <ee4j-community-request@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Send ee4j-community mailing list submissions to
        ee4j-community@xxxxxxxxxxx

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-community
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        ee4j-community-request@eclipse.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
        ee4j-community-owner@eclipse.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of ee4j-community digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: EE4J Project Proposals (Mike Milinkovich)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 10:29:00 -0500
From: Mike Milinkovich <mike.milinkovich@eclipse-foundation.org>
To: ee4j-community@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ee4j-community] EE4J Project Proposals
Message-ID:
        <e381dd0b-5bde-fa0e-1dec-71951bce2276@eclipse-foundation.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed

On 2017-11-22 9:31 AM, reza_rahman wrote:
> EE4J at the moment is merely a Top Level Eclipse project. There is
> this name search and the "Profile" or "Future EE Spec" may be a
> project under that umbrella or somewhere else. Technology where
> MicroProfile or JNoSQL sit are othr TLPs. JPA EclipseLink or JSON-B
> Yasson are currently under "Runtime", but unless this separation was
> desired and e.g. Eclipse Glassfish (not mentioned yet) better remained
> there, I would be surprised not to see EclipseLink or Yasson also move
> to the EE4J umbrella project.

I can confirm that EclipseLink and Eclipse Yasson have started the
process to move under the EE4J top-level project. Thanks




------------------------------

_______________________________________________
ee4j-community mailing list
ee4j-community@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-community


End of ee4j-community Digest, Vol 3, Issue 60
*********************************************

_______________________________________________
ee4j-community mailing list
ee4j-community@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-community

--
Mike Milinkovich
mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(m) +1.613.220.3223