Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [ee4j-community] GlassFish Tools

All,

Konstantin's answer is exactly correct. But I would like to add a little more context to this.

In the past Glassfish and the other Oracle-led projects required contributors to sign the Oracle Contributor Agreement, which gave Oracle joint ownership of any outside contributions. So Oracle owned 100% of the copyright in the projects. That is not how the IP flows work for Eclipse projects.

The Eclipse Foundation uses a model called "symmetrical inboud/outbound licensing", which means that all contributions are (a) still owned by the contributors, (b) contributed under the project license (e.g. EPL-2.0), and (c) made available to consumers under that same project license. This means that no single party --- not Oracle, not the Eclipse Foundation itself --- gets any particular rights in the projects. Once EE4J gets going and other people and organizations start to contribute, no one --- not Oracle, not the Eclipse Foundation itself --- will have the ability to unilaterally re-license the projects.

We like this model because it puts all of the contributors on a level footing.

HTH

On 2017-10-30 1:38 PM, Konstantin Komissarchik wrote:
Under Eclipse Development Process (EDP), all contributors retain their copyright, but agree to license the contribution under EPL. So, the initial contribution would be copyrighted by Oracle. Any non-Oracle contribution that are made to the project once it’s started will have that person’s or company’s copyright.

Thanks,

- Konstantin


On Oct 28, 2017, at 2:37 AM, Mohamed M. El-Beltagy <melbeltagy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Will Oracle still be holding the copyrights after being an Eclipse project?
How does this fit with contributors' effort?


Back to the top