[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [ee4j-community] EE4J and the JCP
|
+1 - we’ve been involved for 5-7 years as the LJC and we’ve very much come to the same conclusion
We've tried to change the JCP
over the years and have made some improvements but many of the things we
(collective we) wanted to change ran into issues with various legal and
process problems. I'm not allowed to disclose but suffice it to say that I
believe we have evolved the JCP as far as we can where it is today and time
spend trying to change it more would be better spent elsewhere.
Sent with AquaMail for Android
http://www.aqua-mail.com
On
9 October 2017 11:02:33 reza_rahman <reza_rahman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I would like to hear a bit more from the EE4J stakeholders, but my
impression is that Oracle has no intention of doing anything else with Java
EE in the JCP.
You are correct in that I am
alluding to the fact that Oracle has the unique power to unilaterally vote
down whatever it wants in the JCP. While I am sure that could be changed, I
am not sure it is worth it or whether it is even accomplishable. My
impression also is that the Eclipse Foundation is not that averse to
functioning more like a standards body.
Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S7, an AT&T 4G LTE
smartphone
--------
Original message --------
Date: 10/9/17 1:48 PM
(GMT-05:00)
Subject:
Re: [ee4j-community] EE4J and the JCP
_______________________________________________
ee4j-community mailing list
ee4j-community@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-community
_______________________________________________
ee4j-community mailing list
ee4j-community@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-community
--
Cheers, Martijn (Sent from Gmail Mobile)