OK, this is some property in pom.xml
but what about OSGI headers:
* Implementation-Vendor-Id:
* Specification-Vendor:
* Bundle-Vendor:
* Implementation-Vendor:
Shall all those 3 vendos be set to ${vendor.name}?
I'm not sure especially with "Specification-Vendor".
What about Implementation-Vendor-Id? Is "jakarta" or "jakarta.ee4j"
a good choice?
Tomas
Dne 31/10/18 v 16:56 Jim Krueger
napsal(a):
Ok, So to be clear: For all 4 Stable EE4J projects
(management-api, enterprise-deployment, jax-rpc-api, and
jaxr-api) will will change
<vendor.name>Oracle
Corporation</vendor.name>
to
<vendor.name>Eclipse
Project for Stable EE4J APIs</vendor.name>
and remove the following:
<name>Oracle
Corporation</name> |
</ organization>
I agree with Wayne.
Also, EE4J parent pom contains organization section. It’s
set to Eclipse Foundation.
If you use the parent pom you can omit the organization
section and organization will be derived from the parent
pom.
— Dmitry
_______________________________________________
ee4j-build mailing list
ee4j-build@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-build
_______________________________________________
ee4j-build mailing list
ee4j-build@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-build
|