[eclipsecon-na-program-committee] One more duplicate

[John Arthorne <John_Arthorne@xxxxxxxxxx>]

There is one more potential duplicate that
I had in mind but forgot to bring up:

http://www.eclipsecon.org/2013/sessions/how-become-eclipse-committer-and-survive
http://www.eclipsecon.org/2013/sessions/revise-eclipse-development-process

As I said in one of the comments, if
we are aiming for about 5 community talks, having two from Wayne is not
representative.  Lars commented that the "revise" talk is
aimed more at insiders and likely not of interest to wider audience. Although
it is a topic that is very important to me personally, I agree with that
assessment. I think we should reject the second one, and keep only the
"how to become committer" talk. If there are changes to the development
process coming in 2013 that committers need to know about, they can cover
that in the first talk. More detailed discussion on revising the development
process would be a good topic for a smaller side meeting of interested
committers, perhaps as part of or combined with the regular architecture
council meeting that traditionally occurs on the Sunday before the conference.
If you agree with this, please revise your vote down on the second talk...

John