If we went that route, than the same can be said for Web Enterprise
content as well. :)
Since I'm the only representative for WTP related content.
Dave
On 11/28/2011 12:01 PM, Sven Efftinge wrote:
Sure! But representation of
Modeling within the committee is close to not existent.
On Nov 28, 2011, at 5:57 PM, Schaefer, Doug wrote:
I’m not certain that’s true. The
Eclipse community is pretty huge outside of
Modeling ;).
We already have less modeling
talks than were initially planned (20 were
planned we have 15).
The reason why they are voted
so low and little is merely because 'modeling'
is not as well represented in the PC as it is
in the community.
On Nov 28, 2011,
at 5:36 PM, Schaefer, Doug wrote:
These were added to ensure we
had sufficient content for the Modeling
track. Whether that’s the right thing to
do is a valid question.
It
appears we have nine slots for
tutorials. I have marked 9 with ‘in1’
as a strawman.
We
also have three more standard talks to
drop to fit into 63. I’m open to
ideas.
I’m
sure we’ll have a lot to debate during
today’s meeting. Reminder that it is
at 12 eastern. Same number and I’ll
send out a webex.
I’m
hoping that Wed will be our last call.
We should have everything pinned by
then. Hopefully J.
_______________________________________________
eclipsecon-na-program-committee mailing list
eclipsecon-na-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipsecon-na-program-committee
_______________________________________________
eclipsecon-na-program-committee mailing list
eclipsecon-na-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipsecon-na-program-committee
_______________________________________________
eclipsecon-na-program-committee mailing list
eclipsecon-na-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipsecon-na-program-committee
|
