| Re: [eclipsecon-na-program-committee] 5's |
|
I’ve added the in1 tags to the talks below. I wonder about the Mylin talk below. Could this be considered ALM? Although it seems more like a tooling talk. We also talked about the YAKINDU talk at the meeting. As Sven mentioned and confirm with my modeling background, statecharts are really the only useful visual
modeling paradigm J. But it’s sitting below 3.2 which makes me uncomfortable (unless it happens
to climb ;)). :D From: eclipsecon-na-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:eclipsecon-na-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Sven Efftinge On Nov 24, 2011, at 3:19 PM, Ian Skerrett wrote:
I thought we agreed on including up to 3.25 votes. That would include : Jan gave that talk also at EclipseCon and it was totally crowded. He's a great speaker and he has a lot to say about that topic. I like this one, since although as modeling talk it's rather code centric and it discusses the heavy use of singletons in EMF. Might be bit controversial, which is good. Not 3.25 and not my cup of tea, but well known presenters : If we'd include those three we would have 16 including the early pick. I think that's fair given the initially allocated 20 talks Sven
Definitely and I don’t want it to have so much weight that we trade off good talks with marginal talks. I am putting a PC tag called ‘in1’ on all the talks that currently make the cut. You can filter on that keyword and see the list. Right this minute there are
73 based on our discussions this morning. Once we filter out duplicates and speaker overload and topic overload we may even have room to add one or two more. I’ll keep tweaking the list as we go. And we’ll bring up talks to add and remove from that list here.
Please don’t add or remove the tag yourselves. Thanks for all the hard work gang. We’re doing pretty good. And have a great Thanksgiving to our American friends! Doug.
From:
eclipsecon-na-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:eclipsecon-na-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Ian Skerrett fwiw, the specifically labeled the allocation 'rough' since I expected it not to be exact. I guess in the end we can only pick 63, given the five early birds and two director picks. Also note your list has 20 for tools/other but Ian's
only had 18.
_______________________________________________ eclipsecon-na-program-committee mailing list eclipsecon-na-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipsecon-na-program-committee --
_______________________________________________ eclipsecon-na-program-committee mailing list eclipsecon-na-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipsecon-na-program-committee -- _______________________________________________ |