Re: [eclipsecon-na-program-committee] Early bird

[John Arthorne <John_Arthorne@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> Ian Skerrett <ian.skerrett@xxxxxxxxxxx> 
> 3)      There are actually quite
a few that may fit in the ALM 
> track. Are the ALM people on this list? Could they go through a 
> sweep and pick out some they believe should be in the ALM track?
> 
> The ALM people are not on this list.  I can go through the sessions
> but I also don't want to reassign arbitrarily.   How about people
> leave a comment on sessions you think should be assigned to Agile
> ALM and I will work from those?   Alternatively, people could
send 
> suggestions to this list?

It seems cruel to ask ALM PC to review all 184 submissions
to see what might be appropriate to move. I suggest we forward a smaller
list to the Agile/ALM PC and invite them to recategorize if they agree.
As I was reviewing the submissions I made a note of a few that I think
are good candidates for Agile/ALM, but not great talks for EclipseCon (in
my opinion). 

http://www.eclipsecon.org/2012/sessions/using-trac-support-kanban
http://www.eclipsecon.org/2012/sessions/scrumbox-building-perfect-scrum-app-eclipse-technology
http://www.eclipsecon.org/2012/sessions/effective-mockito-modular-world
http://www.eclipsecon.org/2012/sessions/bonita-studio-integrating-challenging-eclipse-technologies-eclipse-rcp-application-through-
http://www.eclipsecon.org/2012/sessions/e3-automotive-world

John