Sorry, I missed the call, had an other conference conflict, as I
thought the call was moved to Thursday.
Anyway, I agree with John. Need to keep the program balanced. I
personally like more tutorials, but I know that isn't everybody's
thing. And after having set through a bunch of 45 to 50 minute
sessions this week, I an even more appreciative of the 20 - 25
minute format we've done the last couple of years.
Dave
On 08/24/2011 12:12 PM, John Arthorne wrote:
I have two quick
questions that I didn't
have a chance to bring up on the call. I'll throw them out here
because
I'm sure they can easily be handled offline.
1. What is the name of the
conference?
I am finding there is some confusion now when you say
"EclipseCon",
since there are now two EclipseCon's per year. Should we be
consistently
trying to bill it as EclipseCon North America, EclipseCon
America, or simply
EclipseCon 2012? Being consistent on the name might help clear
up confusion
for people.
2. Any feedback data the PC can
get
on the talks from past conferences would be a huge help for us.
I'm sure
we're all tempted to select talks that "we" want to hear, but
not everyone is an elite Eclipse insider. We all need to get an
understanding
of what the bulk of attendees want to hear about, so we can
choose talks
accordingly. So if you can share information from past EC's on
talk votes,
what talks were full, what the general feedback forms said, that
would
be very helpful.
Thanks,
John
_______________________________________________
eclipsecon-na-program-committee mailing list
eclipsecon-na-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipsecon-na-program-committee
|
