Hi Christopher,
I am not quite convinced that anonymized GA is not GDPR compliant.
Can you shed more light on the decision made by Eclipse Foundation management?
Ø
their data being shared with random and arbitrary third parties like Bosch, EclipseSource, etc.
In the GA dashboards there is no explicit user shown anywhere, after anonymization of the IPs even the location should be unavailable. Hence, this data is no more user’s data,
so the users themselves should not give explicit acceptance for anybody to use it. Btw. We publish aggregated data from the GA in each release notes as an advertisement publicly.
In general – why GA data for OSS projects like ours should be something private anyway?
Regards,
Nedelcho
From: <eclipse.org-project-leadership-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of "Nanivadekar, Nikhil" <Nikhil.Nanivadekar@xxxxxx>
Reply-To: Mailing list for all people involved in Eclipse project management <eclipse.org-project-leadership@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, 18 May 2018, 7:07
To: Mailing list for all people involved in Eclipse project management <eclipse.org-project-leadership@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [eclipse.org-project-leadership] General Data ProtectionRegulation(GDPR) at Eclipse Foundation
Hi Christopher,
No, it's not required to call it "Home".
In that case, can you please check the eclipse.org/collections site and clear it in the audit if all looks ok? The website is a simple html page and the footer
contains all the necessary links (I think).
Regarding the user data collection, if the website has links to external websites (like GitHub) then that external website might be collecting user data. I presume
that since the user is voluntarily clicking on the link and navigating to an external website, it should be ok. Is my understanding correct?
Thanks,
Nikhil.
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
See
http://www.gs.com/disclaimer/global_email for important risk disclosures, conflicts of interest and other terms and conditions relating to this e-mail and your reliance on information contained in it.
This message may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please advise us immediately and delete this message. See
http://www.gs.com/disclaimer/email for further information on confidentiality and the risks of non-secure electronic communication. If you cannot access these links, please notify us by reply message and we
will send the contents to you.
From: eclipse.org-project-leadership-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:eclipse.org-project-leadership-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Christopher Guindon
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2018 8:05 PM
To: Mailing list for all people involved in Eclipse project management <eclipse.org-project-leadership@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [eclipse.org-project-leadership] General Data ProtectionRegulation(GDPR) at Eclipse Foundation
We will no longer allow committers or project leads to collect user data or track user activity on Eclipse Foundation-owned domains, since that data may be shared with the third-party companies who employ them -- an action for which our
users have not given explicit consent.
For more information, please see Mike Milinkovich comment:
Hi Nikhil,
Is it required to specifically call the link as “Home” in the footer? Currently we call it “Eclipse Foundation” or are we supposed to call it
“Eclipse Foundation Home”?
No, it's not required to call it "Home".
In this audit what does the light/red/pink color mean? Some pink rows have comments, but some are pink without comments.
The site is broken or not available.
We found a issue that could be problematic with the GDPR and the project should investigate.
If there is no comment, it usually mean that the site is embedding some kind of 3rd party widget from twitter or google.
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 5:19 PM, Nanivadekar, Nikhil <Nikhil.Nanivadekar@xxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Christopher,
I see for some projects (like Eclipse Collections) there is a comment saying “Missing Home link in
the footer”
Is it required to specifically call the link as “Home” in the footer? Currently we call it “Eclipse
Foundation” or are we supposed to call it “Eclipse Foundation Home”?
Thanks,
Nikhil.
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
See
http://www.gs.com/disclaimer/global_email for important risk disclosures, conflicts of interest and other terms and conditions relating to this e-mail and your reliance on information contained
in it. This message may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please advise us immediately and delete this message. See
http://www.gs.com/disclaimer/email for further information on confidentiality and the risks of non-secure electronic communication. If you cannot access these links, please notify us by reply
message and we will send the contents to you.
From:
eclipse.org-project-leadership-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:eclipse.org-project-leadership-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Christopher Guindon
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2018 2:18 PM
To: Mailing list for all people involved in Eclipse project management
Subject: Re: [eclipse.org-project-leadership] General Data ProtectionRegulation(GDPR) at Eclipse Foundation
Hi All,
This is a friendly reminder that the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) becomes
enforceable on May 25th, 2018.
We added GDPR documentation on our website:
On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 11:12 AM, Christopher Guindon <chris.guindon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Projects can also test changes to their website with our Eclipse Foundation PHP Docker images:
https://hub.docker.com/r/chrisguindon/webdev/.
which PHP version we should choose or how we can select it on our website?
The PHP version of
www.eclipse.org is 5.5. I would recommend you test your code with chrisguindon/webdev:php5.5
I created these images to mimic our current environment but we are not using them for production.
The web development process for the Eclipse Foundation Webdev team is the following:
1. We use our PHP Docker images for local development
3. Changes are committed after the code is reviewed and approved in Gerrit.
On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 10:38 AM, Dawid Pakuła <zulus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
which PHP version we should choose or how we can select it on our website?
Quick update regarding "Approved Eclipse Logos". Projects are not required to use Eclipse Foundation
logos in their footer but if they chose to do so, they must be from our Artwork page: https://eclipse.org/artwork/
Is there a tempate or instructions for Project Leads to apply the Quicksilver theme already?
Thanks,
Werner
It's possible to test your changes with our staging server (https://staging.eclipse.org)
by pushing your commits to a branch named "staging".
Will you also check whether the Quicksilver theme is used and report it?
Dani
Eclipse projects are not required to use the Quicksilver theme. I believe it will be easier for projects using Quicksilver to be compliant with the GDPR since we will do what we
can in the theme layer to validate consent.
If you are using additional 3rd party services, you will need to make sure to identify who has access to the data and you must make sure that consent was given by the user before
those services can be enabled regardless if you are using an Eclipse Foundation theme or not.
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-project-leadership mailing list
eclipse.org-project-leadership@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-project-leadership
IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation. To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact
emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-project-leadership mailing list
eclipse.org-project-leadership@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-project-leadership
IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation. To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact
emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.
--
Christopher Guindon
Lead Web Developer
Eclipse Foundation
Twitter: @chrisguindon
--
Christopher Guindon
Manager, Web Development
Eclipse Foundation
Twitter: @chrisguindon
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-project-leadership mailing list
eclipse.org-project-leadership@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-project-leadership
IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation. To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact
emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.
--
Christopher Guindon
Manager, Web Development
Eclipse Foundation
Twitter: @chrisguindon
|