[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Photon M7 not ready
|
Dani,
I've created https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=534867
Is there a concrete
bug report that describes the concrete bug that needs to be fixed?DaniFrom:
"Mikaël
Barbero" <mikael.barbero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>To:
Eclipse
Planning Council private list <eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx>Date:
18.05.2018
15:14Subject:
[eclipse.org-planning-council]
Photon M7 not readySent
by: eclipse.org-planning-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx Dear planning councilAs you may have seen on cross-project
and epp-dev, M7 is still not ready. An issue about checksums in aggregated
p2 repo has been discovered yesterday. A couple of tentative fixes have
been made, unsuccessfully (some of which have been delayed by other issues:
contributions disappearing, CBI JIPP getting down...). I'm still investigating, but I guess
we want a plan B.First, I'd like to ask you to test what
is currently ready and could be made visible anytime now: http://download.eclipse.org/releases/photon/201805181000/(it's not added to the composite http://download.eclipse.org/releases/photon/).
Could you please try to install/update stuff from it, especially plugins
and features listed here https://gist.github.com/nickboldt/077e517c64e9750d07a385ae586f4b0bMy tests on a Photon M6 don't raise any
issue, despite the checksum issue. If we are good, we could ask EPP to
use this repo to build and make this repo available. It will buy us some
time by RC1 staging completion (next Wed.) in order to fix the issue.Other solution. The issue appears only
for project using very latest p2 version to build (either directly or from
Tycho 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT) being Eclipse projecst (platform, pde, jdt...) and
objectteams. Maybe we could reach out to them asking to build with a version
of p2 which does not break the simrel build. It's less than ideal, but
not unreasonable IMO.Finally, I can also "manually"
edit the p2 artifacts files to fix the checksum. It's a bit less reasonable
that previous solution.WDYT? --Mikaël Barbero - Eclipse FoundationIT Services - Release Engineering📱 (+33) 642 028 039📧 mikael.barbero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx🐦 @mikbarbero[attachment "signature.asc"
deleted by Daniel Megert/Zurich/IBM] _______________________________________________ eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council
IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to
the Eclipse Foundation. To be permanently removed from this list,
you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal._______________________________________________ eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxxhttps://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation. To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.
|
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP