| Re: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Mars+1 Naming Issues |
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Not that I want to make this more complicated, but how about just "N" ?
WayneOn 25/02/15 12:03 PM, Chris Aniszczyk wrote:Hey esteemed planning council members,We've hit an interesting roadblock with Mars+1 naming:"We have now completed trademarks reviews for Neptune, Nova, and Neo and our external counsel has strongly advised against using any of those three names. Newton remains a registered trademark of Apple. None of the remaining names on that list are all that appealing, nor did they get much support. Do we need to restart the process?"Names eliminated:Neo: 8%Neptune: 38%Newton: 11%Nova: 25%Names left:Naboo: 8%Narvi: 3%Nash: 2%Nano: 2%Nibiru: 2%Naiad: 1%This is a first for the planning council as we usually had one of our backups work.Without making things more complicated, my suggestion is that we do a lazy consensus poll potentially work down the list based on votes or just pick a couple of favorite names from what's left. If we go simply by votes, Naboo and Narvi are next on the list.What do you think?_______________________________________________ eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation. To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.