I already sent an email :)Thx On 2011-03-14, at 5:54 PM, Chris Aniszczyk wrote: On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 4:41 PM, John Arthorne <John_Arthorne@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
That list of names sounds good. Last year
was a mess because we initially had some kind of "open" polling
system but someone wrote a script to stack the votes [1]. So, we ended
up using a polling system the Eclipse Foundation has set up, where you
have to be a committer to vote. Not as inclusive, but at least the result
is reliable.. I suggest we just use the Foundation's polling system again.
Ask webmaster for details.
[1] http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/eclipse.org-planning-council/msg01784.html
Ah, that's what happened!
I created a bug for the webmaster...
--
Cheers,
Chris Aniszczyk
http://aniszczyk.org
+1 860 839 2465
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list
eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council
IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation. To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal. |
