Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
[eclipse.org-planning-council] Exception or change required for 4-part version number?


As you all know, we require sim,. rel. bundles and features to have 4-part version numbers, to best take advantage of OSGi's runtime specifications.

http://wiki.eclipse.org/Version_Numbering

But ... if my quick reading of bug 316717 is correct, this is not always possible, or desirable? ... in maven community?
(And it was a very quick read, so don't take my word for it, but please read bug 316717.
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=316717

My question or concern is ... is our "Version_Numbering" spec out of date? Behind the times? Does more need to be said
for 3-part version "exceptions" ... or are the comments/conclusions referenced in bug 316717 incorrect?

John, as the primary author of
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Version_Numbering
can you take a look and advise us?

There's no urgent rush ... I just want to try and  
know the answer, before someone asked the question.

Thanks,


Back to the top