Re: [eclipse.org-planning-council] A suggested topic for PlanningCouncil

[David M Williams <david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I'd like to suggest or remind the Planing Council
members review the minutes from our last meeting in June, before our meeting
on Tuesday. 

http://www.eclipse.org/org/councils/20070620PCMinutes.php
especially the section on 
Europa Retrospective; Ganymede Thoughts

I found them interesting and helpful.

Bjorn Freeman-Benson <bjorn.freeman-benson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: eclipse.org-planning-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

11/04/2007 11:36 PM

Please respond to
"eclipse.org-planning-council"        <eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	"eclipse.org-planning-council" <eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	Re: [eclipse.org-planning-council] A         suggested        topic        for          PlanningCouncil  Discussion

Scott,
Excellently said, and I think you've hit on one of the two keys questions
being discussed:
1.        What
should the release train be? (Taking into account that the community seems
to think that it is a polished product and that the projects do not have
the resources to do cross-project testing.)
2.        Who
should decide and enforce the requirements of the release train and/or
packages?
- Bjorn

Scott Lewis wrote: 
To abuse this metaphor a little:  why wouldn't/shouldn't
the train be focused on the needs of the consumers (car buyers) as much
as or more than the car manufacturers?  
-- 
[end of message]_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list
eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council