Hi Mike,
Mike Milinkovich wrote:
Doug,
Doug, Ed, et al,
<stuff deleted>
As
a purely practical matter, I honestly doubt that the Eclipse
Foundation as the IP resources to review and approve all the CQs to
ship 30
projects on the same day.
It seems to me this is a Board issue. The projects/committers can't
fix this scaling problem, move their own projects forward, and follow
the IP rules at the same time. Further, even if the number of Ganymede
projects is limited in some way (to some number less than 30) then it
seems to me chances are next year there will be a larger/unmanageable
number of CQs just from those projects.
So
if you guys don’t come up with some rules that
raise the bar and limit who has the process maturity and quality
to get
in, don’t get mad at me for making rude and arbitrary decisions J
If the Board wants a higher level of process maturity and overall
quality for the release train, then why don't they do something more
than mandate that the projects (via e.g. integration testing) and EMO
(IP) must do more with the same resources?
Scott
|
