[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Orion workshop/tutorial at ECE
|
What is the opinion of others ?
I remember we had a proposal for a JDT tutorial (from Stephan Herrmann) last year and despite my effort to promote it, it didnt end well. :-)
So I am all for it, but what do other PC members think ? Achim, Benjamin, Cedric, Jonas ??
Cheers
christian
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Martin Lippert
Gesendet: Dienstag, 16. Juli 2013 17:19
An: eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
Betreff: Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Orion workshop/tutorial at ECE
Hey!
+1
I like this idea very much!!!
Cheers,
Martin
>> Regarding hackathons: Even though I really like programming /
>> hacking, I personally wouldn't do that on a conference, since I find
>> the socializing
> aspects
>> more important. That's why I think even a very well prepared
>> hackathon wouldn't get the attention that it deserves when it's done
>> as a night
> session. But I
>> like the idea to do it in parallel to other long-running sessions /
> symposia or
>> probaly even in parallel to the tutorials. As soon as people got
>> started
> with
>> hacking, chances are good that they will continue that after the
> conference or in
>> their spare-time. Does that make sense?
>
> Just a suggestion: Rather than calling this a hackathon, how about
> making it a tutorial or workshop on "How to get your changes accepted
> by JDT"? In other words, a workshop specifically tailored to educate
> people on how to maximize the possibility that the feature or bug fix
> that they've always wanted to get into JDT would be accepted. Topics
> would include an architectural overview, API stability, long-term
> maintainability, workflow, testing conventions, documentation requirements, etc.
>
> I'm guessing that there are many improvements to this idea that others
> can suggest. But I do think that it would be a popular subject. Also,
> it is a relatively rare event to be able to welcome 4 people from the
> platform team to an EclipseCon. Especially since they are being
> provided with a mandate to prepare such an event we should try to find
> a way to best make use of their availability.
>
> My 2 cents.
>
> _______________________________________________
> eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list
> eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-progra
> m-committee
>
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee
-------------------------------------------------------------
compeople AG
Untermainanlage 8
60329 Frankfurt/Main
fon: +49 (0) 69 / 27 22 18 0
fax: +49 (0) 69 / 27 22 18 22
web: www.compeople.de
Vorstand: Jürgen Wiesmaier
Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Christian Glanz
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Frankfurt/Main
Handelsregister Frankfurt HRB 56759
USt-IdNr. DE207665352
-------------------------------------------------------------