Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
[eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Some general questions regarding voting for talks...

Just a few things that came to mind as I continue to review. Not intended
to be a distraction :)

I find myself strongly inclined to mark OSGi DevCon talks with
a 0 vote, because that conference program is curated separately,
and any plus votes I add only means less Eclipse-specific content.
Does this make me a bad person?

Apologies for missing the latest call, but I'm fascinated by the +/-2
development. Good plan to limit to 5, but it would be interesting to run
an experiment where the number of +/-1 votes is also limited. Was
this discussed?

Lots of names are coming up multiple times - this of course is the
usual conference game. Did this or any previous committee discuss
limiting the submissions per person?

On the long talks that weren't in the finals being moved over to the
short talk list - crunching long talks into short talks is a task that I
have never seen done well, so I'm a bit uncomfortable with doing
it in an automated manner, but I wasn't on the call, so opportunity
missed there. I took the liberty of putting a line on spreadsheet
to delineate the extended talks that have fallen on hard times.

cheers
  --oh


Back to the top