Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Organizing the Panels

[Ian Skerrett <ian.skerrett@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I believe I suggest these two panels.  I was waiting for feedback if the 
PC wanted to select them before entering them into the system.  I don't 
mind organizing them but I don't want to solicit participants unless 
they are going ahead.

The Future of App Servers ->  not in the system
Future Timelines for Open Source ->  not in the system



On 1/22/2010 2:06 PM, Oisin Hurley wrote:
> Let's talk about Panels.
>
> There are nine panel slots. These are in the submission system -
>
> 1209 - Ask The AC Panel
> 1211 - Eclipse for Mobile Application Development Panel
> 1237 - Application Models for OSGi BoF
> 1347 - The Coalition Against EMF
> 1441 - Developing at Eclipse
> 1442 - Build and Continuous Integration with Eclipse
> 1455 - Scraping the Barnacles - What parts of Eclipse...
> 1456 - I Love This Project, But Where Are The Docs?
> 1525 - Testing and TDD - the Good, the Bad and the Ugly
> 1528 - Eclipse Modeling Panel
>
> Hit https://www.eclipsecon.org/submissions/2010/search.php?search=type%7E%27panel%27
> for the list.
>
> These are on the Wiki https://www.eclipsecon.org/wiki/2010_Panels
>
> Testing and TDD ->  this is 1525
> The Future of App Servers ->  not in the system
> Future Timelines for Open Source ->  not in the system
> Making Money from Open Source ->  not in the system
> Eclipse Tooling in the Mobile Industry ->  this is 1211?
> Developing at Eclipse ->  this is 1441
> Build and Continuous Integration with Eclipse ->  this is 1442
> Eclipse for the Future - e4 ->  not in the system
> OSGi on the Server ->  could be 1237?
> Modeling ->  1528
>
> One other Panel that was mentioned was an 'Analyst' Panel,
> this may very well correspond to the 'Future timelines for
> open source', I can't remember.
>
> We want to make a distinction between Panels and BoFs -
> there are some of the above that might be better as a
> BoF.
>
> Each Panel we take on needs to have mostly-named set of
> people and a named moderator. Once we accept a panel we
> need to fabricate some questions and also collect more
> questions from the general public. A name will go into
> the submission system as author, that person is responsible
> for managing the Panel.
>
> We have a deadline for a decision on which Panels to take
> on, and that deadline is Wednesday next, 27th January.
>
> Let's discuss these panels and their potential attractiveness
> to the attendees - controversy is good, but informative
> discussion generating light rather than heat is what we are
> looking for.
>
> Please note that Donald is earnestly seeking an extra
> hour for a Director's choice talk. If we believe that we don't
> have enough potential quality to fill the 9 panel slots, then
> we should consider handing over one slot to Don.
>
>   --oh
> _______________________________________________
> eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list
> eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee
>