Funny thing – that was my immediate reaction too.
Tonny is a strong advocate and good speaker.
-
Don
From: eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Kevin McGuire
Sent: December 5, 2008 6:10 PM
To: Eclipsecon Program Committee list
Subject: Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] The UnLoved List
The one red one
that concerns me is Tonny Madsen. I heard he was a good speaker last year
and I know he's a pretty active Eclipse blogger/advocate.
Kevin
|
Scott
Rosenbaum <scottr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by:
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
12/05/2008
05:20 PM
|
Please respond to
Eclipsecon Program Committee list
<eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
|
To
|
Eclipsecon
Program Committee list <eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
|
[eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee]
The UnLoved List
|
|
In the same vein as the
unloved tags. This report shows the unloved submitters. It shows
submit, accept, decline, and neutral grouped by authors.
It highlights (in red) those authors that have not had any of their talks
accepted.
It also highlights (in yellow) any authors that have been accepted on more than
4 talks or that have been accepted to more than 5 hours of presentation time.
I spot checked and it looks like most of these presenters are involved in
a large number of team presentations. Given their roles in the project,
this does not surprise me.
Once again use the information in the way that you feel will build the best
possible conference.
Scott
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee
