Eight minutes? And I thought no one read my
emails. DSDP snatches the carrot before anyone else even moves an
inch, doesn't seem fair. NO TALK FOR YOU! I am skipping dictator and
going straight to despot (imagine maniacal laughter....)
I kill myself sometimes.
I will review DSDP tonight and let you know in the morning.
Everyone else, do we need to have a second place? We still have 10
tutorials, 12 longs, and one Main Stage. You might want to be prepared.
scott
CLONINGER ERIC-DCP874 wrote:
Scott, I think Mobile and
Embedded satisfied your criteria at about 11 AM ET this morning.
-E
All,
I know you are all hard at work getting
your categories in order. It looks like there are some good
negotiations going on to get the submitters to work together and make
their talks more concise.
In case you are wondering how many un-allocated talks are available
here is the list:
- 10 Tutorial Slots
- 12 Long Slots
- 1 Main Stage Presentation
On Tuesday's call next week I want to
have an Aardvark bake-off. Each of you will pitch the talks that you
can't fit into your allocation that you think should be in the program
(aardvarks). My hope is to distributed the un-allocated talks either
on the call or shortly after (email voting).
In order to make this work, we need to
have finished our category reviews. This
means that you should go through your category and:
- Tentative-Accept the talks you can fit given your current allocation
- Tag your Main Stage (if you have one)
- Tentative-Decline talks that we should not consider
- Tag talks that you think are good, but you can't fit as Aardvark
There is not a lot of un-allocated time
to spread between all of the categories so be prepared for some serious
horse aardvark trading.
For this to work we need to be ready. As an incentive, I will give
one long talk to the first category that is ready for the Aardvark sale.
If your category is ready, send an email to the mailing list, I will
review and let you know if you have won. There is a little fine print
at the end of the post that explains the rules a bit more.
I realize that I am being a bit of a dictator here. If you have a
problem with that blame Doug Schaefer, I read his dictator
post last week.
Scott
PROGRAM RULES:
over-submitted
1) This only applies to the categories
that are significantly over-submitted (see below). Data Tooling,
Reporting, e4, CDT, and Committer And Contrib can not win this one
slot. We still want you to participate in the call on Tuesday, so
please make sure you are prepared.
2) No cheating. You can't just accept a bunch of talks, mark the rest
as aardvarks and call it good.
3) Your category can be over-booked if you have a valid plan to reduce
longs to shorts etc. I am not looking for perfection just a clear
idea that your work is done. If it is confusing explain it in your
email (great job to everyone who provided status for the last call).
4) Rules Subject to Change if this poorly thought out idea causes more
problems than it solves.
| Business And Industry |
755% |
over-submitted
|
| OSGi DevCon |
659% |
over-submitted |
| Modeling |
473% |
over-submitted |
| Tools |
471% |
over-submitted |
| Mobile And Embedded |
364% |
over-submitted |
| Runtime |
349% |
over-submitted |
| Other |
327% |
over-submitted |
| Test And Performance |
228% |
over-submitted |
| UI / RCP |
200% |
over-submitted |
| Emerging Technology |
196% |
over-submitted |
| SOA |
178% |
over-submitted |
| Java |
173% |
over-submitted |
| Web Tools |
161% |
over-submitted |
| Data
Tooling |
117% |
not eligible
|
| Reporting |
108% |
not eligible |
| e4 |
101% |
not eligible |
| CDT |
100% |
not eligible |
| Committer
And Contributor |
99% |
not eligible |
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee
|
