How about Program:
As in Reporting Program, or WTP Program,
or generically EclipseCon Program? Then are titles as program chairs makes
sense too.
Scott
From: eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bjorn Freeman-Benson
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007
9:19 AM
To: Eclipsecon
Program Committee list
Subject: Re:
[eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Vocabulary
Well... I'm open to other suggestions for
distinguishing between "track" and "track"...
Gaff, Doug wrote:
So we’re now all “Category Leads”?
Sounds a look silly, but if it makes you happy, we can do it.
EC PC,
For vocabulary clarity, let’s use the following terms when discussing
content:
- type - keynote, tutorial, long talk,
short talk, etc. – the length and format of the session
- category - one of the two things that
used to be known as a "track", this is how the program committee
divides itself into sub-PCs: there is an RCP category and an OSGi category
and a New Technology category and a Web Tooling category, etc.
- track - the other of the two things
that used to be known as a "track" and still is: these are the
user defined (or Ian defined) traces through the entire program. For
example "Bjorn's Track" or the "Dynamic Languages
Track".
Ok with everyone?
