Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Grouped short talks idea

[Jeff McAffer <Jeff_McAffer@xxxxxxxxxx>]

If we have the time/space I am in favour
of "double shorts" as we did with tutorials.  Whether they
are back to back or separate will depend on the context.  I can think
of a couple rejected long talks that could use this approach.

Jeff

Bjorn Freeman-Benson <bjorn.freeman-benson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

01/16/2007 04:48 PM

Please respond to
Eclipsecon Program Committee list        <eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	Eclipsecon Program Committee list <eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	[eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Grouped short talks idea

EclipseCon Program Committee,
One idea for those topics that are too short for a long talk (or we didn't
have room for) but are too complex for a short talk - maybe we could accept
a few "grouped short talks". The idea is that you give the speaker
say, two short talk slots, instead of just one slot. Either back-to-back
or scattered throughout the conference. I prefer the scattered idea because
then it allows more people to sample the topic. 

Thoughts?
Bjorn
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee