[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Long Talk and Panel final roundup
|
This sounds good to me, Philippe. I'd leave the one you'd consider a good
5th unresolved for now, as we'll likely have room after we finish panels and
see how short talks turn out (110 slots with 45 submissions so far and 4
days to go).
Thanks,
Rich
On 1/11/07 9:41 AM, "Philippe P Mulet" <philippe_mulet@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> For the Java track, I think the suggested choices are not optimal, since we
> would end up with no talk about user experience.
> Ideally, I think the distribution of Java presentations should look like.
>
> 1. one talk on Java in general
> 2. one talk on JDT
> 3. one talk on user experience with Eclipse Java tools
> 4. one talk on other topic (tooling or dev practices)
>
> We have already accepted submissions for (1) and (2) (see below with
> '====>' prefix).
>
> 1. one talk on Java in general
> =======>[3727] Java 7 Language Features
> [3825] Threads, java.util.concurrent and Eclipse Jobs: problems and
> solutions
> 2. one talk on Eclipse JDT
> =======>[3786] Unleash the Power of Refactorings in your Products!
> 3. one talk on user experience
> [3768] Apache Harmony: Developing the Java platform with Eclipse
> [3812] Java 5.0: A developer experience
> [3888] Story from the Trenches: Migrating from C++ to Eclipse
> 4. one talk on tooling topic or dev practices
> [3650] The Fine Art of Reverse Engineering
> [3723] Runtime monitoring and adaptation of applications from Eclipse
>
> To me, it looks that we should pick one talk for (3) and one for (4).
> My personal inclination would be respectively: [3768] and [3650].
> 3768 - because Harmony is an interesting exercize which brings together
> Eclipse JDT and OSGi bundles.
> 3650 - not quite sure it is in the right track, but it has the most votes.
> For 3825, I think it is interesting too, but I suspect it has little to do
> with Eclipse per se, and we already have one submission about Java in
> general (Java7) which I believe is more important. If we had one more slot
> in Java track, then yes I would agree with this one, since the speaker is a
> good one.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
>
>
>
> Richard Gronback
> <richard.gronback
> @borland.com> To
> Sent by: Eclipsecon Program Committee list
> eclipse.org-eclip <eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-com
> secon-program-com mittee@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> mittee-bounces@ec cc
> lipse.org
> Subject
> Re:
> 01/08/2007 02:43 [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-com
> AM mittee] Long Talk and Panel final
> roundup
>
> Please respond to
> Eclipsecon
> Program Committee
> list
> <eclipse.org-ecli
> psecon-program-co
> mmittee@eclipse.o
> rg>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The slot below makes 4 for OSGi, not 3. The sooner we can resolve Java,
> OSGi, and RCP tracks the better (tomorrow would be good).
>
> Thanks,
> Rich
>
>
> On 1/7/07 8:39 PM, "Jeff McAffer" <Jeff_McAffer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> Rich wrote on 01/07/2007 04:41:43 PM:
>
>> As we¹re already past our deadline and soon need to start reviewing
>
>> short talks and demos, I plan to do the following in order to
> finish
>> up our long talk & panel selections and schedule rooms (speak now
> if
>> you object, or better, resolve your tracks asap :)
>>
>> Panels:
>
>> 1. Reclaim the panel slots from C++, Reporting, RCP, and Tools, as
>> they have no submissions.
>
> In RCP we are still trying to come up with a panel that touches on
> aspects of the talks that could not be accepted.
>
>> 2. Allocate one to Fundamentals and accept both of its submissions
> -
>> 3757: What sucks about Eclipse (2 PC votes, 1 community vote) &
>> 3891: How we learned to stop worrying and love Eclipse UA (1 PC
>> vote, 16 community votes)
>> 3. Accept OSGi panel 3900: What does the future hold for OSGi? (2
> PC
>> votes, 4 community votes)
>
> I believe that Peter has been working on creating an OSGi panel from
> some rejected talks...
>
>> 4. Accept Web panel 3747: What does Eclipse need to do to become
> the
>> IDE for AJAX?
>> 5. Decline the rest. This gives us 10 panels overall, and frees up
>
>> some space we may need on Thursday due to a potential room
> conflict.
>>
>> Long Talks:
>
>> 1. In the Java track, accept 3650: The fine art of reverse
>> engineering (3 PC votes, 1 community vote) & 3825: Threads, java.
>> util.concurrent and Eclipse Jobs: problems and solutions (1 PC
> vote,
>> 2 community votes).
>> 2. In the OSGi track, accept 3705: Using OSGi back-end system for
>> the purpose of enterprise management of Eclipse IDEs
>
> It would be great if we could rustle up an additional slot for OSGi.
> There is lots of stuff to talk about and currently only 3 slots
> including the extra one mentioned here.
>
>> 3. In the RCP track, accept 3628: Rich client platforms: Eclipse
> RCP
>> compared with NetBeans Platform (2 PC votes, 13 community votes);
>> 3816: How to make your RCP application NOT look like Eclipse (1 PC
>> vote, 4 community votes)
>
> The RCP track subcommittee is still reviewing and debating. We'll
> resolve in the next couple days.
>
>> 4. In the SOA track, accept 3882: STP Components (2 PC votes);
> 3887:
>> From modeling to execution in the enterprise using BPMN and BPEL
>> (2 PC votes)
>> 5. In the Web track, accept 3869: XML Development Tools in Eclipse
>> WTP and beyond (1 PC vote, 1 community vote)
>> 6. Decline the rest. This gives us 67 with another one (or two)
>> coming to Mike¹s Director¹s Choice track
>
> Jeff
>
> _______________________________________________
> eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list
> eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-commit
> tee
>
>
> --
> Richard C. Gronback
> Borland Software Corporation
> richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx
> +1 860 227 9215_______________________________________________
> eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list
> eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-commit
> tee
>
> _______________________________________________
> eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list
> eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-commit
> tee
--
Richard C. Gronback
Borland Software Corporation
richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx
+1 860 227 9215
