[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re[2]: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] how to handle13proposals on a 4 slot allocation ?..
|
I'd love to have an extra long talk slot, I am having 15 presentations
of which some are really interesting and only 2 slots ...
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
RG>
RG> Somehow, I skipped Modeling (sorry, Ed) ;-)
RG>
RG> Modeling 5/13 1/1
RG>
RG> Thanks,
RG> Rich
RG>
RG> On 12/12/06 8:48 AM, "Richard Gronback"
RG> <richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
RG>
RG>
RG> Ive looked at the overall numbers for Long Talks and Panels and
RG> have the following summary with suggestions (allocations/submissions):
RG>
RG> Track Long Talk Panel Comment
RG> Business 4/15 1/0 Convert panel to talk, or donate?
RG> C++ 2/5 1/0 Convert panel to talk, or donate?
RG> Data 3/3 1/1
RG> Fundamentals 4/14 0/1
RG> Industry 2/3 1/1
RG> Java 4/12 2/1 Recipient of extra/donated slot(s)?
RG> Mashup 2/10 1/1
RG> Mobile 5/11 1/1
RG> OSGi 2/15 1/1 Recipient of extra/donated slot(s)?
RG> Reporting 5/10 1/0 Convert panel to talk, or donate?
RG> RCP 4/20 1/0 Convert panel to talk, or donate?
RG> SOA 2/5 1/1
RG> Technology 6/25 1/3 Recipient of donated slot(s)?
RG> Test 4/12 1/0 Convert panel to talk, or donate?
RG> Tools 4/7 1/0 Convert panel to talk, or donate?
RG> Web 5/17 1/2 Recipient of extra/donated slot?
RG>
RG> We have 3 extra Long Talk slots, which I propose are distributed
RG> as indicated above. Otherwise, I believe we can do some
RG> adjustments among the tracks to better distribute slots where
RG> needed, based on need and interest.
RG>
RG> Please reply with your changes, donations, or other ideas on how
RG> we can create a balanced program.
RG>
RG> Thanks,
RG> Rich
RG>
RG>
RG> On 12/12/06 2:20 AM, "Tim Wagner" <twagner@xxxxxxx> wrote:
RG>
RG>
RG> In a similar position in WTP with around 20 submissions for 5
RG> slots. I suspect we will rule out talks with commercial content as
RG> a first cut, though I have not discussed that with my PMC yet.
RG> Beyond that, we will look for a balance of broad vs narrow, tools
RG> vs frameworks, and current vs new technology.
RG>
RG> The only other option might be including an additional
RG> room/track to increase the number of slots available.
RG>
RG>
RG>
RG>
RG> From:
RG> eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
RG> [mailto:eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Donald Smith
RG> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 2:39 PM
RG> To: 'Eclipsecon Program Committee list'
RG> Subject: RE: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] how to
RG> handle13proposals on a 4 slot allocation ?..
RG>
RG> If it's any consolation, I have 15 business submissions for 4
RG> slots, most of which are quite excellent. I would advise trying
RG> hard to get the community to help you choose.
RG>
RG> - Don
RG>
RG>
RG>
RG>
RG> From:
RG> eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
RG> [mailto:eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Valentina Popescu
RG> Sent: December 11, 2006 5:30 PM
RG> To: eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
RG> Subject: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] how to
RG> handle 13proposals on a 4 slot allocation ?..
RG>
RG> Folks,
RG>
RG> For the Test&Perf long talk track we have 13 proposals and only 4 slots allocated.
RG> The plan is to group all proposals in such a way that there will
RG> be one proposal for the following topics : Test. Trace, Code Analysis, Monitoring
RG>
RG> This simple plan seems to be very hard to execute. It is almost
RG> impossible to squeeze 13 proposals under 4, especially since the
RG> presenters represent different groups. I did an initial attempt to
RG> reduce the number by adding a comment on the eclipsezilla track
RG> with the regrouping proposal. The result is an overflowing set of
RG> notes I am receiving from the presenters which clearly are not too happy with the proposal
RG>
RG> Does anybody have a similar experience and a better approach that can be shared?
RG>
RG> Is any other track having unused sits that can be donated to the Test&Perf section ?
RG>
RG>
RG> Thank you,
RG> Valentina Popescu
RG> Senior Advisory Analyst
RG> IBM Toronto Labs
RG> Phone: (905)413-2412 (tie-line 969)
RG> Fax: (905) 413-4850
RG>
RG>
RG> _______________________________________________
RG> eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list
RG> eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
RG>
RG> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee
RG>
RG>
RG>
RG> --
RG> Richard C. Gronback
RG> Borland Software Corporation
RG> richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx
RG> +1 860 227 9215
RG>
RG>
--
Peter Kriens Tel +33467542167
9C, Avenue St. Drézéry AOL,Yahoo: pkriens
34160 Beaulieu, France ICQ 255570717
Skype pkriens Fax +1 8153772599