[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] slots in flux
|
I share the concern, and am flexible. I would vote for Debug, but if others
object to it, given it is a last minute submission, I can understand.
Jeff McAffer
<Jeff_McAffer@ca.
ibm.com> To
Sent by: Eclipsecon Program Committee list
eclipse.org-eclip <eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-com
secon-program-com mittee@xxxxxxxxxxx>
mittee-bounces@ec cc
lipse.org
Subject
Re:
11/15/2006 11:55 [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-com
PM mittee] slots in flux
Please respond to
Eclipsecon
Program Committee
list
<eclipse.org-ecli
psecon-program-co
mmittee@eclipse.o
rg>
Ok so my vote would be to use the mashup slot on
Fundamentals
http://eclipsezilla.eclipsecon.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3674 Building
Commercial-Quality Eclipse Plug-Ins
As for the debug one in Java, I am mixed. That submission is coming very
late and it feels a little funny to have it displace viable/desirable
submissions that came on time (the community may observe and object to
this). If we can argue that it is needed to fill out an area that has a
coverage hole that's great but it needs to be weighed against the other
holes that, for example, WTP is looking to fill.
Tim, what ones are you looking to add in the Web track?
Jeff
Richard Gronback
<richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: To
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-comm Eclipsecon Program Committee
ittee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx list
<eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program
-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx>
11/15/2006 04:43 PM cc
Subject
Please respond to Re:
Eclipsecon Program Committee list [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program
<eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-co -committee] slots in flux
mmittee@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks, Jeff.
If the Java track accepts the shortened Debug tutorial (3701), they will be
set.
In Fundamentals, I’m fine with keeping the top 3 listed below (they all
have majority votes).
With Legos moving to a long talk, and with the Maven track from the Java
track being preferred, we can accept the DITA talk in Mashup, leaving us
with 2 extra allocations.
It seems we agreed the server side Eclipse tutorial (3607) is desirable, so
it takes one, if no one objects.
So if my math is correct, we’re down to one leftover and a number of
options, including Jeff’s list below and Tim’s request from Web
Development. And for some reason, I feel Bjorn may have another last
minute recommendation :)
Best,
Rich
On 11/15/06 1:52 PM, "Jeff McAffer" <Jeff_McAffer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Below is a summary of various tracks that seem to be in flux. Some tracks
have extra while others not enough. So given this, I propose slot
reallocation as follows (details below):
Mashup 1 => OSGi
Mashup 1 => Fundamentals
Java 1 => Java, RCP, ???? (we can debate the merits of the various
remaining proposals)
Jeff
Fundamentals +1
Long
http://eclipsezilla.eclipsecon.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3635 PDE Build
and build clinic
- combine this one with Gunnar's (
http://eclipsezilla.eclipsecon.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3583).
- I believe Pascal has talked to Gunnar about joining forces but not
sure if actual arrangements have been made.
Short
http://eclipsezilla.eclipsecon.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3626 Eclipse APIs
and Java 5
http://eclipsezilla.eclipsecon.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3645 Fundamentals
of Eclipse Plug-in Development
Additional short
http://eclipsezilla.eclipsecon.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3674 Building
Commercial-Quality Eclipse Plug-Ins
- I have had some interaction with Eric and Dan. They are willing to
cut down to a short tutorial.
RCP +1
Long
http://eclipsezilla.eclipsecon.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3667 Developing
Eclipse Rich-Client Applications
Short
http://eclipsezilla.eclipsecon.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3585 RCP
Development Using the Workbench and JFace
http://eclipsezilla.eclipsecon.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3655 Intro
Framework: Making a Good First Impression
http://eclipsezilla.eclipsecon.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3664 UI Forms: I
can't believe it's not browser
Additional short
http://eclipsezilla.eclipsecon.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3648 Creating
Enterprise Business Applications Using Eclipse RCP
- not sure why this has no votes...
- might make a good long talk?
OSGi +1
Long
http://eclipsezilla.eclipsecon.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3630 SOBA
Short
http://eclipsezilla.eclipsecon.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3632 Spring
Additional short
http://eclipsezilla.eclipsecon.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3607 Server side
- this is hot imho
Java -1
Short
http://eclipsezilla.eclipsecon.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3639 Maven
http://eclipsezilla.eclipsecon.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3582 SpoonJDT
http://eclipsezilla.eclipsecon.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3618 Annotations
http://eclipsezilla.eclipsecon.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3693 JDT
fundamentals
One extra in this track but there is a late breaking debug submission...
Mashups -2
Short
http://eclipsezilla.eclipsecon.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3672 DITA
Two extra here if we recast the Lego submission as a long talk (which I
think is reasonable btw)
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee
--
Richard C. Gronback
Borland Software Corporation
richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx
+1 860 227 9215_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee
