[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Summary of Java track status on short tutorials
|
On Maven topic, it appears that 3639 comes from the original contributors.
Thus I would give them my preference.
+ 3582 Enhancing Java with SpoonJDT
+ 3618 Writing a Java Annotation Processor for Eclipse
+ 3693 JDT fundamentals - Become a JDT tool smith
+ 3639 Team Collaboration with Eclipse and Maven
So I am up to 4 slots used; and could donate a slot. After discussing with
Jeff, it feels like it could be used in OSGi track.
Bjorn
Freeman-Benson
<bjorn.freeman-be To
nson@xxxxxxxxxxx> Eclipsecon Program Committee list
Sent by: <eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-com
eclipse.org-eclip mittee@xxxxxxxxxxx>
secon-program-com cc
mittee-bounces@ec
lipse.org Subject
Re:
[eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-com
11/15/2006 05:24 mittee] Summary of Java track
PM status on short tutorials
Please respond to
Eclipsecon
Program Committee
list
<eclipse.org-ecli
psecon-program-co
mmittee@eclipse.o
rg>
Philippe P Mulet wrote:
> I believe the first 3 submissions are good matches.
> + 3582 Enhancing Java with SpoonJDT
> + 3618 Writing a Java Annotation Processor for Eclipse
> + 3693 JDT fundamentals - Become a JDT tool smith
>
Excellent.
> There is a problem for the Maven submission. As observed already, it
> overlaps with 3636 in mashup track. I think it is still an interesting
> topic, and would be donating one slot for it if needed either in Java or
> mashup track, but for the combined form.
> + 3639 (merged with 3636) Team Collaboration with Eclipse and Maven
>
We do need to be careful not to have too many Maven tutorials, i.e., we
should probably only have one.
> This one is catchy, not directly in Java track (I suspect not even
Eclipse
> specific). I could donate a slot for it if it moved elsewhere. I don't
> really mind it staying in Java tracks if causing troubles.
> +(mashup?) 3660 How to program LEGO robots with Java
>
I wonder if this might not be better as a long talk (in the Mashup
track)? I added a comment to the submission to that effect.
But I'd like to attend it (and of course I'm representative of the whole
conference :-) !
- Bjorn
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee
