[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re[2]: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] tutorial deadline
|
I just went through the list of tutorials and did my votes. Some
remarks.
Many titles use names and abbreviations that require insider
knowledge. I think it is worth the effort to go through the titles
to clean up those names and abbreviations and let the title clear what
problem is being addressed.
I was late to the game, what should I do next? Do I accept the
tutorials I like or is there a more PC oriented process?
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
RG>
RG>
RG> Great, thanks Chris (and Jeff, and Bjorn). Hopefully, others
RG> will find the time today to cast their votes (we'd like to have
RG> more "external" votes in the Modeling track, right Ed? ;)
RG>
RG>
RG>
RG> Best,
RG>
RG> Rich
RG>
RG>
RG> From:
RG> eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
RG> [mailto:eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chris Aniszczyk
RG> Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 11:31 PM
RG> To: Eclipsecon Program Committee list
RG> Subject: Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] tutorial deadline
RG>
RG>
RG> I chimed in with my votes, I suggest people do the same soon
RG> otherwise it will look like we aren't caring enough (for people like Wassim that is ;p)
RG> Cheers,
RG> ---
RG> Chris Aniszczyk | IBM Lotus | Eclipse Committer | +1 860 839 2465
RG> Jeff McAffer ---11/13/2006 08:49:22 PM---The tutorial acceptance
RG> deadline is on Wed I believe. Have people been voting using the
RG> PC voting mechanism? Many of the subm
RG>
RG> From: Jeff McAffer <Jeff_McAffer@xxxxxxxxxx> To:
RG> Eclipsecon Program Committee list
RG> <eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date:
RG> 11/13/2006 08:49 PM Subject:
RG> [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] tutorial deadline
RG>
RG> The tutorial acceptance deadline is on Wed I believe. Have people
RG> been voting using the PC voting mechanism? Many of the submissions
RG> I've been looking at have either no votes, my votes or Richard's
RG> votes. If I understand correctly, we are free to (and
RG> encouraged?) to vote on submissions in all tracks. Is that
RG> accurate? What are other people doing?
RG> I guess I'd like to see more of what everyone else thinks and is
RG> choosing. Without that it feels like we are creating 18 parallel conferences.
RG> Jeff _______________________________________________
RG> eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list
RG> eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
RG> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee
RG>
--
Peter Kriens Tel +33467542167
9C, Avenue St. Drézéry AOL,Yahoo: pkriens
34160 Beaulieu, France ICQ 255570717
Skype pkriens Fax +1 8153772599
