RE: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Long talk #204 isnotavail

["Tim Wagner" <twagner@xxxxxxx>]

I still can’t get to there from here, but thanks for the info.

 

---

From: eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bjorn Freeman-Benson
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 11:36 AM
To: Eclipsecon Program Committee list
Subject: Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Long talk #204 isnotavailable

 

It's up for me (or back again or the network is back or whatever)
http://canuck.gda.itesm.mx/eclipsezilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40
The presesenter is Allan Pratt, IBM
apratt {_at_} us.ibm.com

Tim Wagner wrote:

Then 40 it is. Sri, would you mind checking with the submitters of 40? (I can’t verify who they are, since canuck seems to be down again.)

 

---

From: eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Paul M Vanderlei
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 10:22 AM
To: Eclipsecon Program Committee list
Subject: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Long talk #204 is notavailable

 

Good thing I checked. Nick Edgar has politely DECLINED to present #204.

:-P

 

Paul VanderLei

Embedded Java Enablement Team

1750 Ridgemoor SE

Grand Rapids, MI 49506

616.975.1985

pvlei@xxxxxxxxxx

 

"I don't see architecture coming from you." -Jerry Seinfeld

 

 

 

Tuesday, January 31, 2006 9:46 AM
To: "Eclipsecon Program Committee list" <eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc:
From: "Tim Wagner" <twagner@xxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] long talk vote

That’s a majority. Paul, would you call Nick and check? If he can do it, let’s go with that (and let me know so I can begin the admin work with Erin to get his paperwork to him.) Otherwise we’ll pursue 40.

 

---

From: eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Paul M Vanderlei
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 4:31 AM
To: Eclipsecon Program Committee list
Subject: Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] long talk vote

 

Looks like the voting is a landslide, which makes me ask.....Has anyone double-checked with Nick that he is still willing to do this talk? I would be willing to do that today, once Tim declares that 204 is in fact the selection.

 

Paul VanderLei

Embedded Java Enablement Team

1750 Ridgemoor SE

Grand Rapids, MI 49506

616.975.1985

pvlei@xxxxxxxxxx

 

"I don't see architecture coming from you." -Jerry Seinfeld

 

 

 

Tuesday, January 31, 2006 1:57 AM
To: "Eclipsecon Program Committee list" <eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc:
From: "Tim Wagner" <twagner@xxxxxxx>
Subject: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] long talk vote

I’ve heard only support for 40 and 204, so let’s confine it to those two. Maher,Gunnar, MikeT, and Paul have “pre-voted” for 204 and I’m assume Sri is voting for 40.

 

Would others please let me know their preference, and I’ll declare the result Tuesday.

 

As a reminder, 40 was the next on our short list; 204 was a high priority RCP track recommendation that we missed due to some miscommunication about the original track preferences. If you feel reconsidering 204 is invalid given our voting process, then simply vote for 40.

_______________________________________________

eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list

eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx

https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee