RE: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] long talk vote

["Gaff, Doug" <doug.gaff@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I vote for 204

 

---

From: eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tim Wagner
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 1:57 AM
To: Eclipsecon Program Committee list
Subject: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] long talk vote

 

I’ve heard only support for 40 and 204, so let’s confine it to those two. Maher,Gunnar, MikeT, and Paul have “pre-voted” for 204 and I’m assume Sri is voting for 40.

 

Would others please let me know their preference, and I’ll declare the result Tuesday.

 

As a reminder, 40 was the next on our short list; 204 was a high priority RCP track recommendation that we missed due to some miscommunication about the original track preferences. If you feel reconsidering 204 is invalid given our voting process, then simply vote for 40.