Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] ACTION REQUIRED:Final vote for long talks needed today

We did include Eric Clayberg’s RCP overview, based in part on Instantiations demonstrated knowledge and presentation experience in this area. However, I can pass 204 along to Ian/Bjorn/Mike as a suggestion for how the EMO might choose to populate one of its remaining slots, especially if they feel that additional RCP virtual track content is beneficial.

 


From: eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Paul M Vanderlei
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 1:32 PM
To: Eclipsecon Program Committee list
Subject: Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] ACTION REQUIRED:Final vote for long talks needed today

 

FYI, I was talking to Jeff "RCP" McAffer today and he was surprised we had passed on #204, which he considers to be sort of the central RCP long talk. When I suggested that it was a wee bit late to suggest that now, he acquiesced and confessed that they were "pretty bad" about these kinds of deadlines. So, while I know there are no write-ins allowed, if by some miracle we think we have space for another RCP long talk, Jeff suggests 204.

:-P

 

Paul VanderLei

Embedded Java Enablement Team

1750 Ridgemoor SE

Grand Rapids, MI 49506

616.975.1985

pvlei@xxxxxxxxxx

 

"I don't see architecture coming from you." -Jerry Seinfeld

 

 

 

Tuesday, January 10, 2006 1:59 PM
To: "Eclipsecon Program Committee list" <eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc:
From: "Tim Wagner" <twagner@xxxxxxx>
Subject: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] ACTION REQUIRED: Final   vote for long talks needed today

This is the final vote for long talk acceptances; we’ll conduct it by email to ensure that everyone on the PC can participate in the process (not everyone could make the call today).

 

Voting Procedure: 3 votes per program committee member, no write-ins (nominations are now closed). Please reply to this email with your 3 picks; do not use the EclipseZilla flags, as they indicate interest rather than final round voting.

 

1. http://canuck.gda.itesm.mx/eclipsezilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77

77/79 - Contributing to Eclipse: Case Studies of Successful Fixes and Enhancements (including Philippe Ombredanne’s merged #79, Patching Eclipse).

 

2. http://canuck.gda.itesm.mx/eclipsezilla/show_bug.cgi?id=305

305/187 - Lessons from the trenches: Developing integrated help sets and information centers for large-scale projects / Building Integrated Help for a Commercial Eclipse Project.

 

3. http://canuck.gda.itesm.mx/eclipsezilla/show_bug.cgi?id=330

330 - Challenges and solutions for building an Embedded IDE Platform in the Automotive Industry.

 

4. http://canuck.gda.itesm.mx/eclipsezilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40

40 - Probing Java Application Behavior with Probekit (TPTP).

 

5. http://canuck.gda.itesm.mx/eclipsezilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21

21 – Extending the Visual Editor (VE tutorial we declined, reconstituted as a long talk).

 

6. http://canuck.gda.itesm.mx/eclipsezilla/show_bug.cgi?id=148

148 - Managing APIs with Eclipse API Scanner.

 

7. http://canuck.gda.itesm.mx/eclipsezilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118

118 – Consuming and Producing Web Services with WST and JST.

 


Back to the top