| Noted. 
 Wayne
 
 
 On 09/09/2013 10:03 AM, Daniel Megert
      wrote:
 The Eclipse top-level
        project participates
        with http://projects.eclipse.org/projects/eclipse/releases/4.4.0
        and offset 0.
      
 Dani
 
 
 From:      
         Wayne Beaton
        <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>
 To:      
         eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
 Date:      
         29.08.2013 05:03
 Subject:    
           [eclipse.org-planning-council]
Luna
        participation
 Sent by:    
           eclipse.org-planning-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
 
 
 
 
 Greetings Planning Council.
 
 With Kepler, I populated the "participating projects" page [1]
        in the PMI based on the contents of the portal. As projects
        showed up late,
        I updated the page manually.
 
 I've created a page for Luna [2] and have updated the process in
        the documentation
        [3].
 
 The short version is that I've turned things around with the new
        implementation.
        In the old implementation, a project had to "flip the bit" in
        their own project metadata via the portal. This was pretty
        difficult to
        track as there was no notification when a change occurred, and
        there was
        no restriction on when the bit could be flipped. Several
        projects added
        themselves retroactively to one or more releases.
 
 The current implementation starts from the Simultaneous Release
        record.
        To that record, I can add a project, version, and offset. My
        intention
        is open this functionality up to Planning Council members, but I
        haven't
        got that implemented yet. In the meantime, it has to be me that
        makes the
        change.
 
 I will monitor the cross-project-issues-dev mailing list and
        update the
        record as declarations of participation come in. I'll look to
        the top-level
        project representatives on the Planning Council to make sure
        that no projects
        are forgotten (i.e. tell me if you notice a discrepancy). Making
        projects
        use the mailing list has the benefit of ensuring that they're
        actually
        on the mailing list. It has the further advantage of giving me
        an opportunity
        to press projects to create a release record and populate it
        with plan
        information. Again, I look to the top-level project
        representatives to
        assist with this.
 
 There is likely going to be some confusion, especially for
        projects that
        have been participating for a while. I will make an announcement
        on the
        cross-project-issues-dev mailing list describing the change in
        process.
 
 Wayne
 
 [1] https://projects.eclipse.org/releases/kepler
 [2] https://projects.eclipse.org/releases/luna
 [3] http://wiki.eclipse.org/SimRel/Simultaneous_Release_Requirements#State_intent_early_.28M4.29
 --
 Wayne Beaton
 Director of Open Source Projects, The
            Eclipse Foundation
 Learn about Eclipse
            Projects
 [attachment
          "attm1uit.htm" deleted by Daniel Megert/Zurich/IBM] _______________________________________________
 eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list
 eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
 https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council
 
 IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes
          internal to
          the Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this
          list,
          you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.
 
 
 |