[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
| Re: [eclipse-pmc] One Eclipse project is still using CVS | 
I've fixed the eclipsebuilder metadata.
It move a while back. 
And, yes, my year ends on M4. :) 
Speaking of metadata, is this "wall
of shame" URL supposed to show something for "eclipse"?
Anything? Is this a sign something else is wrong with metadata? Or, just
a PHP or tool quirk? 
http://eclipse.org/projects/tools/status.php?git=0&cvs=1&top=eclipse
Thanks for the reminders, 
From:      
 Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To:      
 eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx,
Date:      
 11/27/2012 02:28 PM
Subject:    
   Re: [eclipse-pmc]
One Eclipse project is still using CVS
Sent by:    
   eclipse-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
There are two CVS repositories listed in the project metadata.
/cvsroot/eclipse/org.eclipse.releng.basebuilder
/cvsroot/eclipse/org.eclipse.releng.eclipsebuilder
Is eclipsebuilder included in your plan?
Does your year end on December 21/2012? :-)
Wayne
On 11/27/2012 02:22 PM, David M Williams wrote: 
I think we are all done, except for one cvs project, org.eclipse.releng.basebuilder,
and that is one we don't want to blindly put in git (because it is mostly
a whole lot of binary copies of sdk bundles -- 4 Gigabyte's worth) but
instead move two or three small projects into git and then build with SDK.
Tracked in bug 324682. 
Its on my list of things-to-do this year, so, yes, almost ready. 
That's all I am aware of. 
[1] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=324682
From:         Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To:         "eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx"
<eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
Date:         11/27/2012 01:16 PM 
Subject:         [eclipse-pmc] One Eclipse project
is still using CVS 
Sent by:         eclipse-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Greetings Eclipse PMC.
The eclipse.platform.releng project is still using CVS. The project metadata
indicates that there are two CVS repositories still in use.
http://eclipse.org/projects/project.php?id=eclipse.platform.releng
Is this just inaccurate metadata, or does this repository need to be moved
to Git?
Further, there seems to be ~450 directories under /cvsroot/eclipse that
are potentially active (i.e. they still seem writeable to me).
Is the Eclipse project ready for the CVS shutdown?
Wayne
-- 
Wayne Beaton
The Eclipse Foundation
Twitter: @waynebeaton
Explore Eclipse
Projects 
 _______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
eclipse-pmc mailing list
eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse-pmc
_______________________________________________
eclipse-pmc mailing list
eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse-pmc
-- 
Wayne Beaton
The Eclipse Foundation
Twitter: @waynebeaton
Explore Eclipse
Projects 
 _______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
eclipse-pmc mailing list
eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse-pmc
Attachment:
STG53452
Description: Binary data
Attachment:
STG30268
Description: Binary data