| Renaming makes sense for long-term clarity. 
 e4 is positioned as an incubator that will spin out technology to other projects.  As such, e4 is not "a thing".  The origins of a particularly technology are not that relevant 6 months down the road. As a thought exercise, what if something from e4 matures into EMF? 
 On that note, has there been much discussion around where the various bits should go?  For example, there are a number of "core" things that may make sense to go to Equinox as friends of DS and the extension registry. 
 Jeff 
On 2010-06-25, at 9:12 AM, Mike Wilson wrote: _______________________________________________Thanks for putting this together, John.
 At the risk of creating a lot more work for ourselves, have we considered removing the "e4" designation in the package names as part of the move?
 
 McQ.
 
 <graycol.gif>John Arthorne---2010/06/24 02:50:43 PM---As discussed in the past, we would like to move several bundles out of e4 into Platform, in order to process a 4.0 release this
 
 
 
| <ecblank.gif> From:
 | <ecblank.gif> John Arthorne/Ottawa/IBM@IBMCA
 |  | <ecblank.gif> To:
 | <ecblank.gif> eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
 |  | <ecblank.gif> Date:
 | <ecblank.gif> 2010/06/24 02:50 PM
 |  | <ecblank.gif> Subject:
 | <ecblank.gif> [eclipse-pmc] Requesting approval for move of bundles from e4 to	platform
 |  
 
As discussed in the past, we would like to move several bundles out of e4 into Platform, in order to process a 4.0 release this summer. The first step in the formal process is to have a "Move Review" to obtain Eclipse Foundation approval to move the affected bundles from e4 to Platform. A prerequisite to that review is to receive official, documented PMC approval for the move. As such, I am requesting approval from the PMC for this move. Details on precisely what is moving and what committers are affected can be found here: http://wiki.eclipse.org/E4/4.0_Release_Process
 
 
Please vote and/or discuss. We can also discuss this on the call next week if desired, but given all the holidays I thought it best to start the process on this list. 
 
+1 from me, obviously ;) 
 
Thanks, 
John_______________________________________________ eclipse-pmc mailing list
 eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
 https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse-pmc
 
eclipse-pmc mailing list
 eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
 https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse-pmc
 
 |