Please ask the PMC's opinion.
Thanks,
Wayne
On 05/23/2013 12:38 PM, Scott Lewis
wrote:
On 5/23/2013 9:33 AM, Wayne Beaton
wrote:
API breakage doesn't sound like a "service" release.
It wasn't expected/intended:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/408034
But after discussion and notification [1], we decided to go ahead
with it for 3.6.1.
Scott
[1] http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/ecf-dev/msg06298.html
Wayne
On 05/23/2013 12:15 PM, Scott Lewis
wrote:
On 5/23/2013 4:50 AM, Wim Jongman wrote:
Congratulations guys. Good work.
with respect to the maintenance release, 3.6.1. Since there
is API breakage, and there is now TCK compliance. Would it
not be better to go for 4.0.0?
For the Kepler release (3.6.1), it's too late to shift to
4.0.0. For major release increments we have to schedule,
produce review materials, and have a release review with the
EF...and it's far too late for that.
As well, because of '1' below...for filetranser and core our
3.6.1 release version already in the platform.
For our next release (whenever that is), we could do
4.0.0...but I would prefer that we get more/other new stuff in
to justify that.
Scott
_______________________________________________
ecf-dev mailing list
ecf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ecf-dev
_______________________________________________
ecf-dev mailing list
ecf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ecf-dev
_______________________________________________
ecf-dev mailing list
ecf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ecf-dev
|
