| Hi Franky, 
 I will try to comment further today (Thursday).  I'm very occupied
    these days, and haven't yet had a chance to go over your patches
    carefully.  I will try to do so this morning.
 
 But in the mean time...thanks for your most excellent contribution
    on this!  It is most appreciated by me...and I believe the entire
    community will benefit.  It's a very important area, and I'm looking
    forward to getting the contribution into ECF remote services.
 
 Thanks,
 
 Scott
 
 
 
 On 10/7/2010 7:43 AM, Franky Bridelance wrote:
 
      Hi,   Any comment on the proposed approaches for remote service
        call authorization?    br,   Franky
 
 2010/10/6 Franky Bridelance <franky.bugzilla@xxxxxxxxx> 
          Hi Markus,   I've attached two patches: patch_approach1.txt contains
            the changes for the wrapper approach (first one described in
            my email), patch_approach2.txt contains the changes for the
            pre and post invocation hooks.  IMHO, I think second approach is better because the
            implementation of the IRemoteServiceCallPolicy does not need
            to perform the remote call.     
 
_______________________________________________
ecf-dev mailing list
ecf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ecf-dev 
 |