Re: [ecf-dev] Re: [riena-dev] Riena Update

[Christian Campo <christian.campo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Jan,

thanks. So that would mean you have a connected socket between the  
various spaces all the time. So the point from the discussion with  
Scott that I think that this make R-OSGi a connectionoriented provider  
and not a connectionless provider. I am not saying this is good or bad  
here.

Like with Webservices (say SOAP or any other protocol) over HTTP its  
possible to reuse a connected socket but typically you disconnect  
after each call and connect for the next one.

Is that the correct assumption Jan ?

So that makes me still wonder if there is an ECF provider currently  
available that is connectionless ?

cheers
christian

Am 13.01.2009 um 16:28 schrieb Rellermeyer Jan Simon:

> Hi Christian,
>
> that's true. You create a mesh of point-to-point connections to  
> define your remote service space. Once you have done that, you can  
> access the remote services over this mesh without creating new  
> dedicated connections.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jan
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> MSc Jan S. Rellermeyer, Systems Group, Department of Computer  
> Science, ETH Zurich
> IFW B 47.1, Haldeneggsteig 4, CH-8092 Zürich, Switzerland
> http://www.systems.ethz.ch
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ecf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ecf-dev- 
> > bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> > On Behalf Of Christian Campo
> > Sent: Dienstag, 13. Januar 2009 09:05
> > To: Eclipse Communication Framework (ECF) developer mailing list.
> > Cc: Riena Developers list
> > Subject: Re: [ecf-dev] Re: [riena-dev] Riena Update
> >
> > Hi Scott,
> >
> > Thanks for your comments. I have a question about them. You  
> > classify r-
> > osgi as a connection-less provider. I remember that in r-osgi you
> > connect a client container with a server container and that will then
> > trigger some dynamic service proxies to be generated on the client
> > container.
> >
> > My assumption was that this initial connection is held and also used
> > for the remote service invocation calls itself. Is that an incorrect
> > assumption ? Maybe somebody like you or Jan could clarify that for  
> > me.
> >
> > thanks
> > christian
> >
> > Am 13.01.2009 um 02:22 schrieb Scott Lewis:
> >
> > > Hi Rieners,
> > >
> > > As discussed a week or so ago with Christian, I've produced some
> > > comments about the previously published Riena RemoteServices Goals
> > > on a
> > > separate page here:
> > http://wiki.eclipse.org/Comments_on_the_Riena_Project_Goals_and_Relatio
> > nship_to_ECF_project
> > > I placed a link at to the comments at the bottom of the associated
> > > Riena
> > > RemoteServices page
> > >
> > > http://wiki.eclipse.org/Riena_RemoteServices
> > >
> > > If more/other/detail or further discussion is desired about  
> > > anything,
> > > please let me and others know (on this mailing list and ecf-dev
> > > mailing
> > > list).
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Scott
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > ecf-dev mailing list
> > > ecf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ecf-dev
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ecf-dev mailing list
> > ecf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ecf-dev
> _______________________________________________
> ecf-dev mailing list
> ecf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ecf-dev