[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
| Re: [ecf-dev] E-intro [Was Efficient downloads] | 
Hi Scott,
thanks for your quick reply.
We need a very robust file transfer implementation for our application. 
I believe that if we cooperate on this we'll create something really good.
Purpose:
- have downloads as fast as possible (optimize downloads for case that 
the download capacity is bigger than single location's upload capacity)
- have downloads reliable (download everything or nothing, avoid saving 
corrupted files if possible)
- have downloads convenient (automatic recovery, discovery of alternatives)
- let downloads have good UI (verbose enough, good cancel/pause/resume 
response)
Let me list features we are looking for (just a brainstorming, no 
specification yet):
- multiple protocol support (http/https/ftp/file...)
- pause/resume using partial content requests (connection can be 
closed/reopened before an attempt to resume)
- resume from a different location (e.g. different mirror)
- multi threaded download of one artifact from one location (starting at 
different content offsets)
- multi threaded download of one artifact from several locations at the 
same time
- multi threaded download of several artifacts at the same time (using 
either single threaded or multi threaded single artifact downloads)
- retrieving information from special headers (like Content-Disposition)
- detecting URL redirections to final mirrors
- detecting approximate user's geographical position
- collecting download statistics (slow/unreliable mirror discovery)
- dynamic switching between mirrors in case of slow download
- automatic recovery after connection timeout
- good API for verbose progress bars (ability to create a good UI)
- good API for statistics processing
- configurable behavior (enable configuring features described above)
- ...and perhaps many more (?)
I don't know how much from this you already cover. I'll study what you 
currently provide first. All the features don't have to be implemented 
at the same time, we can define development stages to start with more 
important issues and continue with less important ones.
Best regards
 Filip Hrbek
Note: I'll be offline from this Friday until next Sunday, so don't worry 
if I don't answer your emails during next week. I'll be definitely back 
from Monday (11th June).
Scott Lewis napsal(a):
Hi Thomas and Filip,
Thanks!  The help is most welcome.
The filetransfer API is in plugin:  org.eclipse.ecf.filetransfer.
The bundle docs (with pointers to javadocs) is:  
http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/ECF_API_Docs#File_Transfer_API
There are also pointers in wiki to project sets source and test code.
There is a base provider plugin:  
org.eclipse.ecf.provider.filetransfer.  This plugin has an extension 
point that allows other plugins to insert implementations associated 
with various protocols.  See the extension point 
org.eclipse.ecf.provider.filetransfer.fileTransferProtocolFactory.   
The httpclient implementation uses this extension point (and is 
defined in another plugin:  org.eclipse.ecf.provider.filetransfer.http).
The basic implementation that uses jobs for doing pause/resume 
(IFileTransferPausable) is in 
org.eclipse.ecf.provider.filetransfer.retrieve.AbstractRetrieveFileTransfer.  
This can/could be used (and appropriate methods overidden) or 
replaced...up to you as to what makes sense.
Filip please let me and everyone know if you have any 
questions/comments/suggested or needed changes...and thanksinadvance!  
I would/will be curious myself about what http/https impl you are 
looking to use and what specific http/https protocol features you will 
be using as well.
Scott
Thomas Hallgren wrote:
Hi Scott,
We, (the Buckminster team) would like to offer our help in 
implementing protocol-level pause/resume and recovery capabilities 
for the ECF http/https file transfer. I'd like you to meet Filip 
Hrbek. He is the Buckminster guy who currently works on improving our 
materialization. He will be our main resource for this, should you 
accept our help. So Filip, meet Scott. Scott meet Filip.
Regards,
Thomas Hallgren
Scott Lewis wrote:
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Hallgren wrote:
Hi Scott,
Thanks for a very elaborate answer. This looks very promising. Well 
structured, low overhead. Only thing missing if I read you 
correctly is true pause/resume on protocol level (and the failure 
recovery that I think will come as a bonus). Do you have any sense 
what it would take to implement that?
It depends upon each protocol and it's corresponding support in 
(some) protocol library.  I assume you are most interested in 
http/https.  I'll take a look at the httpclient 3.0.1 support for 
pause/resume and failure recovery.
Scott
_______________________________________________
ecf-dev mailing list
ecf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ecf-dev
_______________________________________________
ecf-dev mailing list
ecf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ecf-dev
_______________________________________________
ecf-dev mailing list
ecf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ecf-dev