Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Reminder that M7 is just days away ....

Hi,

 

I’m updating the license files for CDT and I just want to confirm that the only difference in Eclipse Foundation Software User Agreement is the date and the fact that the is no Metro Link Public License anymore.

 

I took that license file from: http://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl/notice.html

 

Thanks

 

From: cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David M Williams
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 11:49 AM
To: cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [cross-project-issues-dev] Reminder that M7 is just days away ....

 

As we in the Platform are preparing for our final +0 contribution for M7, just wanted to remind everyone that M7 +3 is near, and ...

A. Three projects are still disabled due to change in ICU version conflicting with BIRTs version ... would have been good to have a "warmup" build correcting that, so at least dependent projects can be re-enabled to make sure no surprises.
Bug 432464 - Temporary disabled BIRT, MAT, and Stardust for Luna warm up builds

B. Appears many still missing "required legal files":
http://build.eclipse.org/simrel/luna/reporeports/reports/layoutCheck.txt

And while looking at that list ... I couldn't help but wonderer what is the "mycorp" project?
Such as, in the list is com.mycorp.examples.timeservice...
Granted, it is an example, and granted, I do not know the exact "Eclipse rules", but I would think best if even examples used their "eclipse namespace"?

C. Appears some progress in warming up with new SUA
http://build.eclipse.org/simrel/luna/reporeports/reports/licenseConsistency.html

License Consistency Summary

  • Features with conforming (2014) license: 184
  • Features with old (2011) license: 857
  • Features with old (2010) license: 8
  • Features with different (or no) license: 13
  • Features with no license attribute: 0
  • Features with extra licenses: 0


D. I am curious why signing is so hard?
http://build.eclipse.org/simrel/luna/reporeports/reports/verifydiroutput/unsigned.txt


I'm just crack'n the whip ... appreciate everyone's efforts and contributions.
Much thanks,


Back to the top